Preview

Vestnik University of biotechnologiy

Advanced search

Analysis of the influence of rootstocks on the growth and development of pear varieties in a young garden

https://doi.org/10.31677/3033-8433-2026-21-1-26-36

Abstract

The objective of the study was to investigate the most important economically valuable traits of pear scion-rootstock combinations in the arid conditions of the Northern Caspian region. The studies were conducted in 2023–2025. The growth and development characteristics of pear trees in combinations of different varieties and clonal rootstocks were studied, and the performance of pear scion-rootstock combinations in a young orchard was determined. In the studied scion-rootstock combinations, all pear varieties demonstrated high survival rates, reaching 86.8...100.0 %. The earliest vegetation (March 19) was observed in the summer varieties Krasivaya (k) in combination with the PG 17-16 rootstock, Nadezhda – PG-12, Moldavskaya rannyaya – PG-12. Early vegetative bud break began in the autumn variety Banketnaya (k) on March 21 on the PG 17-16 rootstock. The following varieties were characterized by intensive growth: Krasivaya (k) – 51.2 cm on the PG-2 rootstock, Nadezhda 41.6 cm on the Quince S rootstock, Moldavskaya rannyaya – 44.6 cm, Zimnyaya Mlievskaya – 71.2 cm on the PG-12 rootstock. In terms of trunk circumference increase, the best values were recorded for the summer variety Moldavskaya rannyaya on the PG-12 rootstock – 2.2 cm. The best growth of annual shoots reached 17.5 cm in combination with the Quince S rootstock and 17.3 cm with the PG-2 rootstock was noted for the Zimnyaya kuborevidnaya variety. The maximum calculated values of the crown projection area were noted for the varieties Zimnyaya kuborevidnaya (2.3 m2) and Tikhyi Don (2.2 m2) on the “cup-shaped” crown type variant. The analysis showed that the use of the “cup-shaped” pear shaping method on the semi-dwarf rootstock PG-12 gives the best results for the active shoot-forming ability of plants, where the total shoot growth was 58.4 cm per plant.

About the Author

N. I. Matveeva
Caspian Agrarian Federal Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences, Senior Researcher, Department of Fruit and Berry Crops

Astrakhan Region, Solenoye Zaymishche village



References

1. Prichko T.G., Nauchnye trudy Severo-Kavkazskogo federal’nogo nauchnogo centra sadovodstva, vinogradorstva i vinodeliya, 2018, Vol. 17, pp. 32–38. (In Russ.)

2. Bandurko I.A., Semenova L.G., Kagazezheva A.A., Vavilova L.S., Novye sorta i tekhnologii vozdelyvaniya plodovyh i yagodnyh kul’tur dlya sadov intensivnogo tipa (New varieties and technologies for cultivating fruit and berry crops for intensive orchards), Abstracts of reports, Orel, 2000, pp. 22–23. (In Russ.)

3. Babina R.D., Baskakova V.L., Khoruzhy P.G., Kovalenko L.V., Grishaneva L.Yu., Puti povysheniya effektivnosti sadovodstva (Ways to improve the efficiency of horticulture), Collection of scientific papers of the State Scientific Botanical Garden, 2017, Vol. 1, Part 2, pp. 5–12. (In Russ.)

4. Parakhin N.V., Modern horticulture, 2013, No. 2, pp. 1–9. (In Russ.)

5. Sotnik A.I., Tankevich V.V., Plodovodstvo i yagodovodstvo Rossii (Fruit and berry growing in Russia), Collection of scientific papers, Moscow, 2018, Vol. 53, pp. 82–88. (In Russ.)

6. Programma i metodika sortoizucheniya plodovyh, yagodnyh i orekhoplodnyh kul’tur (Program and methods for variety study of fruit, berry, and nut crops), Orel, 1999, pp. 46–47. (In Russ.)

7. Dospekhov B.A., Metodika polevogo opyta (s osnovami statisticheskoj obrabotki rezul’tatov issledovanij) (Methodology of field experiment (with the basics of statistical processing of research results)), Moscow, 1985, 351 p.

8. Sotnik A.I., Tankevich V.V., Transactions of the Kuban State Agrarian University, 2017, No. 4(67), pp. 245–249. (In Russ.)

9. Matveeva N.I., Agrarian scientific journal, 2025, No. 11, pp. 34–39. (In Russ.)

10. Matveeva N.I., Bulletin of the Novosibirsk State Agrarian University, 2025, No. 3(76), pp. 127–136. (In Russ.)

11. Ivanenko E.N., Popova L.V., Agropromyshlennyj kompleks: sostoyanie, problemy, puti resheniya (Agro-industrial complex: status, problems, solutions), Materials of the scientific and practical conference of young scientists, Makhachkala, 2013, pp. 108–112 p. (In Russ.)

12. Sergeev D.V., Sovershenstvovanie tekhnologii vyrashchivaniya posadochnogo materiala grushi s ispol’zovaniem novyh klonovyh podvoev roda Pyrus (Improving the technology of growing pear planting material using new clonal rootstocks of the genus Pyrus), Abstract of Cand. Sci. (Eng.) dissertation, Michurinsk, 2017, 22 p.

13. Menshutina T.V., Kostenko M.G., Sovremennye issledovaniya: teoriya, praktika, rezul’taty (Modern research: theory, practice, results), Collection of materials from the XIII International scientific and practical conference, Moscow, 2025, pp. 179–184, DOI: 10.26118/3186.2025.26.66.030. (In Russ.)

14. Prichko T.G., Oplachko R.A, Gutov I.V., Fruit growing and viticulture of the South of Russia, 2025, No. 96(6), pp. 68–82, DOI: 10.30679/2219-5335-2025-6-96-68-82. (In Russ.)

15. Bandurko I.A., Daguzhieva Z.Sh., Georgadze N.S., Fruit growing and viticulture of the South of Russia, 2025, No. 94(4), pp. 32–41, DOI: 10.30679/2219-5335-2025-4-94-32-41. (In Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Matveeva N.I. Analysis of the influence of rootstocks on the growth and development of pear varieties in a young garden. Vestnik University of biotechnologiy. 2026;(1):26-36. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31677/3033-8433-2026-21-1-26-36

Views: 9

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 3033-8433 (Print)