PHYSIOLOGICAL EFFECT OF PROBIOTIC ZOOVESTIN IN EXPERIMENTS CONDUCTED ON PETS
Abstract
The article focuses on the fact, that probiotic specimens affect insufficiently due to lack of specific microorganisms for gut colonization, response to antibiotics or some feeds, way of applying and doses and periods of applying. The authors explain the importance of estimating the effect of applying new probiotics on domestic animals. The researchers conducted experiments on cats and dogs; the experimental results show the effect of probiotic Zoovestin. The paper estimates the state of blood in the beginning of the experiment and declares that blood of cats and dogs corresponds to the standards. The authors observed the microorganisms as coccus, coliform bacillus with low enzyme ability, yeast-like fungi, globulolytic coliform bacillus and proteus in gut microflora of pets. There were no changes in blood indexes of pets observed. Zoovestin improved gut flora of cats and dogs and made its indexescorrepond to the physiological standards. The researchers observed an increase in number of bifid bacterium and coliform bacillus with low enzyme ability. The number of coccus flora and coliform bacillus with low enzyme ability was reduced and globulolytic coliform bacillus and proteus were removed. The researchers observed better appetite and exterior that characterizes their welfare.
About the Authors
K. V. Zhuchaev
Новосибирский государственный аграрный университет
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
E. A. Borisenko
Новосибирский государственный аграрный университет
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
N. V. Efanova
Новосибирский государственный аграрный университет
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Gorskiy B. V. Izuchenie formirovanie immuniteta u sviney v ontogeneze pri primenenii biologicheski aktivnykh veshchestv [avtoref. dis. … kand. vet. nauk]. Novosibirsk, 2001. 26 p.
2. Klabukova L. N., Makartsev N. G., Volobueva R. A. i dr. Effektivnost’ ispol’zovaniya probiotika na osnove molochnokislykh bakteriy v ratsionakh porosyat [Byul. VNII fiziologii, biokhimii i pitaniya s.-kh. zhivotnykh], no. 1 (1991): 40–45.
3. Charrette R. Effect of a probiotic at weaning on post weaning gain and feed conversion [Proc. 14th IPVS Congress, July 7–10, 1996]. Italy, 1996. 452 p.
4. Auclair E., Brufau J. Yeast as an example of the mode of action of probiotics in monogastric and ruminant species [Feed manufacturing in the Mediterranean region. Improving safety: from feed to food: Proceedings of the III Conference of Feed Manufacturers of the Mediterranean, 22–24 March 2000]. Cahiers-Options-Mediterraneennes. Spain, vol. 54 (2001): 45–53.
5. Kalmykova A. I. Probiotiki: Terapiya i profilaktika zabolevaniy. Ukreplenie zdorov’ya [NPF «Bio-Vesta»; SibNIPTIP SO RASKhN]. Novosibirsk, 2001. 208 p.
6. Zhuchaev K. V., Khalina O. L., Borisenko E. A., Kovalev K. V. Fiziologicheskiy status i kishechnaya mikroflora porosyat na maloy ferme: vozmozhnosti korrektsii [Vestnik NGAU], no. 2 (27) (2013): 58–62.
7. Malik N. I., Panin A. I. Veterinarnye probioticheskie preparaty [Veterinariya], no. 1 (2001): 46–50.
8. Kishnyaykina E. A., Zhuchaev K. V., Belova S. N. Vliyanie probiotika zoovestina na produktivnye i gematologicheskie pokazateli broylerov [Vestnik NGAU], no. 1 (22) (2012): 58–60.
9. Alikin Yu. S., Masycheva V. I. Perspektivy razrabotki i primeneniya preparatov novogo pokoleniya BAV v kachestve lechebnykh i profilakticheskikh sredstv pri boleznyakh molodnyaka [Aktual’nye voprosy veterinarii]. Novosibirsk, 1997. pp. 11–13.
10. Tarakanov B. V., Klabukova L. N., Nikolicheva T. A., Puzach L. V. Mikroflora pishchevaritel’nogo trakta, nespetsificheskaya rezistentnost’ i produktivnost’ porosyat pri primenenii laktoamilovorina [Veterinariya], no. 8 (1999): 51–54.
11. Revajova V., Levkutova M., Pistl J. et al. The influence of colonization by Lactobacillus sp. and E. coli K 88+ on lymphocyte subpopulations in the peripheral blood of gnotobiotic piglets [Acta Veterinaria brno], vol. 69, no. 3 (2000): 195–199.
12. Simon O., Jadamus A., Vahjen W. Probiotic feed additives – effectiveness and expected modes of action [New trends in animal nutrition, 28–29 June, 2001, Jachranka, Poland. Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences], vol. 10, Suppl. 1 (2001): 51–67.
Review
For citations:
Zhuchaev K.V., Borisenko E.A., Efanova N.V. PHYSIOLOGICAL EFFECT OF PROBIOTIC ZOOVESTIN IN EXPERIMENTS CONDUCTED ON PETS . Bulletin of NSAU (Novosibirsk State Agrarian University). 2015;(2):107-111. (In Russ.)
Views:
389
Email this article 
