Asparagus Vigna rot in the south of Western Siberia
https://doi.org/10.31677/3033-8433-2026-21-1-5-16
Abstract
The aim of the work was to study the prevalence, development, and species composition of asparagus vigna (Vigna unguiculata (L.)Walp.) rot pathogens in the south of Western Siberia. The research was conducted in the spring-summer film greenhouse of the Central Siberian Botanical Garden of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (CSBG) in 2018-2025. The research material was the vigna cultivar Sibirskiy razmer. Varieties and accessions from the collection of the CSBG were additionally used to analyze the seeds of cowpeas. The conducted research showed that V.unguiculata accessions are highly susceptible to rot. During the growing season in Western Siberia, root rot, base rot, and fruit rot were observed on this crop. Root rot on cowpeas began to manifest itself from the seedling stage. Initially, the main root was affected, and then the disease spread to the lateral roots and eventually to the base of the plant. The disease developed in the 2-3 leaf phase on the central root, reaching 50%. The rot appeared on the base of the cowpea plants somewhat later than on the underground organs. Most often, the rot appeared on the base during the flowering phase. The prevalence reached 100%. The rot was caused by the following phytopathogenic fungi: Fusarium sporotrichioides, Fusarium oxysporum, Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, and Botrytis cinerea. Fusarium and white rot pathogens dominated on the underground organs and the base of the plant, and white and gray rot pathogens dominated on the fruits. When vigna accessions are affected by rot pathogens, other symptoms of diseases such as wilting, chlorosis, and necrosis may also appear on the plants. It has been found that rot pathogens are retained on (in) V. unguiculata seeds every year, which contributes to the persistence of phytopathogens from one year to the next.
Keywords
About the Authors
O. A. KazakovaRussian Federation
Candidate of Biological Sciences, Associate Professor
Novosibirsk
A. A Nikiforova
Russian Federation
agronomist Novabiotic LLC
Novosibirsk
Y. V. Fotev
Russian Federation
Candidate of Agricultural Sciences, Senior Researcher
Novosibirsk
References
1. Fotev Y.V., Letters to the Vavilov Journal of Genetics and Breeding, 2024, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 35–53, DOI: 10.18699/letvjgb-2024-10-5. (In Russ.)
2. Fotev Y.V., Khramova E.P., Petrov A.F., Vegetables of Russia, 2025, No. 2, pp. 54–60, DOI: 10.18619/2072-9146-2025-2-54-60. (In Russ.)
3. Rukshan L.V., Novozhilova E.S., Food industry, 2022, No. 5, pp. 22–24, DOI: 10.52653/PPI.2022.5.5.006. (In Russ.)
4. Roberts L.M., The food legumes, Recommendations for expansion and acceleration of research to increase production of certain of these high-protein crops, New York, 1970, pp. 127–231.
5. Consensus Document on the Biology of Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) WALP.). Series on Harmonisation of Regulatory Oversight in Biotechnology, No. 60. Environment Directorate, Joint Meeting of the Chemicals Committee and the Working Party on Chemicals, Pesticides and Biotechnology. Environment Directorate, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. Paris, France: OECD, 2015, 44 p., URL: http://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=env/jm/mono(2015)48&doclanguage=en (accessed: 15.10.2025).
6. Nikiforova A.A., Kazakova O.A., Fotev Yu.V., Agro-industrial technologies of Central Russia, 2022, No. 3(25), pp. 64–85, DOI: 10.24888/2541-7835-2022-25-64-85. (In Russ.)
7. Kurkina Y.N., Vegetables of Russia, 2022, No. 6, pp. 113–117, DOI: 10.18619/2072-9146-2022-6-113-117. (In Russ.)
8. Fotev Y.V., Kazakova O.A., Vegetables of Russia, 2019, No. 2(46), pp. 97–105, DOI: 10.18619/2072-9146-2019-2-97-105. (In Russ.)
9. Fotev Y.V., Kazakova O.A., Sun Ts., Proceedings of the Kuban State Agrarian University, 2023, No. 105, pp. 251– 255, DOI: 10.21515/1999-1703-105-251-255. (In Russ.)
10. Fotev Y.V., Kazakova O.A., Vegetables of Russia, 2019, No. 2(46), pp. 97–105, DOI: 10.18619/2072-9146-2019-2-97-105. (In Russ.)
11. Nazarov P.A., Baleev D.N., Ivanova M.I. [et al.], Acta Naturae (Russian version), 2020, Vol. 12, No. 3(46), pp. 46– 59, DOI: 10.32607/actanaturae.11026. (In Russ.)
12. Toygildin A.L., Podsevalov M.I., Toygildina I.A. [et al.], Niva Povolzhya, 2021, No. 2 (59), pp. 19–27, DOI: 10.36461/NP.2021.59.2.004, EDN HYFBBY. (In Russ.)
13. Saquee F.S., Diakite S., Pakina E.N. [et al.], Fusarium head blight, growth, yield, and quality traits of spring wheat as influenced by variety and cultivation technologies, Journal of Agriculture and Environment, 2025, No. 1(53), DOI: 10.60797/JAE.2025.53.3.
14. Matloob A.A., Biological management of the fungi causing root rot disease in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.), SABRAO Journal of Breeding and Genetics, 2025, Vol. 4, pp. 1718–1727, DOI: 10.54910/sabrao2025.57.4.38.
15. Viljoen J.J.F., Truter M., Kritzinger Q., Mycoflora and mycotoxins associated with stored cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp) seeds from smallholder farmers in South Africa, Phytoparasitica, 2025, Vol. 53, pp. 44, DOI: 10.1007/s12600-025-01267-6.
16. Gyasi E., Kotey D.A., Adongo B.A., Adams F.K., Owusu E.O., Mohammed A., Management of major seed-borne fungi of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp) with four selected botanical extracts, Advances in Agriculture, Vol. 2022, Article ID 3125240. 8 pages, DOI: 10.1155/2022/3125240.
17. Li Y.G., Zhang S.Q., Sun L.P., Li S., Ji P., First report of root rot of cowpea caused by Fusarium equiseti in Georgia in the United States, Plant Disease, 2017. Vol. 101(9), pp. 1674–1674.
18. Shrestha U., Butler D.M., Ownley B.H., First report of dry root and stem rot of cowpea caused by Fusarium proliferatum in the United States, Plant Disease, 2015, Vol. 100, No. 4, pp. 0191–2917, DOI: 10.1094/PDIS-09-15-1103-PDN.
19. Chulkina V.A., Toropova E.Yu., Stetsov G.Ya. [et al.], Fitosanitarnaya diagnostika agroekosistem (Phytosanitary diagnostics of agroecosystems), Barnaul, 2017, 210 p.
20. Kirik N.N., Pikovsky M.I., Plant Protection and Quarantine, 2007, No. 12, pp. 31. (In Russ.)
21. Guan Yi.M., Ma Y.Y., Zhang L.L. [et al.], Occurrence of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum Causing Sclerotinia Root Rot on American Ginseng in Northeastern China, Plant Disease, 2022, Vol. 106, No. 5, pp. 1518, DOI: 10.1094/pdis-05-21-1115-pdn.
22. Pouralibaba H.R., Kheirgoo M., Kowkab S., Kouhestani M., Sclerotinia sclerotiorum causes Sclerotinia stem rot on Dragon’s head (Lallemantia iberica), Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection, 2023, Vol. 130, No. 2, pp. 431–436, DOI: 10.1007/s41348-023-00704-0.
23. Vy`priczkaya A.A., Kuzneczov A.A., Mustafin I.I. [i dr.], Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta. Seriya: Estestvenny`e i texnicheskie nauki, 2015, T. 20, No. 1, pp. 194–198. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Kazakova O.A., Nikiforova A.A., Fotev Y.V. Asparagus Vigna rot in the south of Western Siberia. Vestnik University of biotechnologiy. 2026;(1):5-16. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31677/3033-8433-2026-21-1-5-16
JATS XML


























