Evaluation of initial material of winter soft wheat in terms of adaptability in the forest-steppe conditions of Novosibirsk region
https://doi.org/10.31677/2072-6724-2022-62-1-56-66
Abstract
One of the main ways to obtain consistently high yields in Siberian conditions is the use of adaptive varieties. Selection plays a key role in solving this problem. Success in breeding for resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses depends on the correct choice of initial parental forms for crossing. The purpose of the study is to evaluate varieties and promising breeding lines of soft winter wheat of various ecological and geographical origin in terms of productivity and adaptive potential. The results of the study of 68 varieties and breeding lines of winter soft wheat are presented. The studies were carried out on the experimental field of the Siberian Research Institute of Plant Growing and Breeding, a branch of the Institute of Cytology and Genetics of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences. The most favorable conditions for the formation of the winter wheat crop were formed in 2021 (Ij=125.1). The least favorable conditions developed in 2020 (Ij= -171.2). The most winter-hardy varieties were Scepter, Novosibirskaya 32, Pamyati Chekurova, Omskaya 6. The Volzhskaya variety showed high plasticity (bi=1.49), but was not stable over the years. The most stable varieties among highly productive samples were Novosibirskaya 32 (δd² = 13.75), Lutescens 261-3 (δd² = 16.86), Pamyati Chekurova (δd² = 13.95), Zhemchuzhina Povolzh’ya (δd² = 10.33), Volzhskaya 22 (δd² = 22.70). Genotypes combining high rates of plasticity and stability Lutescens 261-3 (bi=1.26; δd²= 16.86) and Volzhskaya 22 (bi=1.97; δd² = 22.70). Samples of Pamyati Chekurova, Scepter, Omskaya 6 and Chekh 16 stood out for a number of indicators: in terms of stress resistance Уmin - Уmax = -51.9 ÷ -282.5; in terms of genetic flexibility (Уmax+Уmin)/2 = 568.8÷651.8; by yield variability V = 4.6÷26.4%; according to homeostasis Hom = 8.13÷94.88; by breeding value Sc = 391.3÷521.5. These samples are of interest in the selection of winter soft wheat to improve adaptability
About the Authors
K. K. Musinov
Siberian Research Institute of Plant Production and Breeding – a branch of the Institute of Cytology and Genetics of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Junior researcher
Novosibirsk Region, b. pos. Krasnoobsk
I. E. Likhenko
Siberian Research Institute of Plant Production and Breeding – a branch of the Institute of Cytology and Genetics of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Doctor of Agricultural Sciences
Novosibirsk Region, b. pos. Krasnoobsk
A. S. Surnachev
Siberian Research Institute of Plant Production and Breeding – a branch of the Institute of Cytology and Genetics of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Junior researcher
Novosibirsk Region, b. pos. Krasnoobsk
References
1. Torbina I.V., Fardeeva I.R., Vestnik Kazanskogo GAU, 2021, No. 2(62), pp. 43–48, DOI 10.12737/2073- 0462-2021-43-48. (in Russ.)
2. Malokostova E.I., Vestnik Ul’yanovskoi GSKhA, 2019, No. 4 (48), pp. 66–69, DOI: 10.18286/1816-4501- 2019-4-66-69. (in Russ.)
3. Mameev V.V., Nikiforov V.M., Vestnik Kurskoi gosudarstvennoi sel’skokhozyaistvennoi akademii, 2015, No. 7, pp. 125–129. (in Russ.)
4. Padovan G., Martre P., Semenov M.A. [et al.], Understanding efects of genotype × environment × sowing window interactions for durum wheat in the Mediterranean basin, Field Crops Research, 2020, Vol. 259, pp. 1–15, DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2020.107969.
5. Haq H.A., Khan N.U., Rahman H. [et al.], Planting time efect on wheat phenology and yield traits through genotype by environment interaction, Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences, 2017, Vol. 27, pp. 882–893.
6. Kochetov V.K., Nauchnyi zhurnal KubGAU, 2012, No. 75, pp. 1025-1036. (in Russ.)
7. Rybas’ I.A., Sel’skokhozyaistvennaya biologiya, 2016, T. 51, No. 5, pp. 617–626, DOI: 10.15389/ agrobiology.2016.5.617rus. (in Russ.)
8. Demina E.A., Kincharov A.I., Taranova T.Yu., Chekmasova K.Yu., Agrarnyi vestnik Urala, 2021, No. 11 (214), pp. 8–19, DOI: 10.32417/1997-4868-2021-214-11-8-19. (in Russ.)
9. Zhuchenko A.A. Adaptivnoe rastenievodstvo (ekologo-geneticheskie osnovy): teoriya i praktika (Adaptive crop production (ecological and genetic foundations): theory and practice), Moscow: Agrorus, 2008, T. 1, 814 p.
10. Kuz’min O.G., Chursin A.S., Krasnova Yu.S., Karakoz I.I., Shamanin V.P., Vestnik OmGAU, 2021, No. 1 (41), pp. 28–36, DOI 10.48136/2222-0364_2021_1_28. (in Russ.)
11. Keler V.V. [et al.], Ecological plasticity of spring wheat varieties in the Krasnoyarsk region, IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci., 2021, 677 042113, DOI:10.1088/1755-1315/677/4/042113.
12. Manukyan I.R., Miroshnikova E.S., Gasiev V.I., Abieva T.S., Machneva N.L., Skamarokhova A.S., Yurin D.A., The assessment of winter wheat agrocenoses adaptivity in the conditions of the submontane zone of the Central Caucasus, Plant Science Today, 2020, Vol. 7 (4), pp. 623–626, DOI: 10.14719/pst.2020.7.4.925.
13. Gudzenko V.N., Vavilovskii zhurnal genetiki i selektsii, 2019, No. 23(1), pp. 110–118, DOI 10.18699/ VJ19.469. (in Russ.)
14. Musinov K.K., Artemova G.V, Stepochkin P.I., Likhenko I.E., Surnachev A.S., Dostizheniya nauki i tekhniki APK, 2021, T. 35, No. 10, pp. 11–16, DOI 10.53859/02352451_2021_35_10_11. (in Russ.)
15. Vavilov N.I., Teoreticheskie osnovy selektsii (Theoretical foundations of selection), Moscow: Nauka, 1987, 512 p.
16. Rybas’ I.A., Gureeva A.V., Marchenko D.M., Grichanikova T.A., Romanyukina I.V., Agrarnyi vestnik Urala, 2017, No. 5 (159), pp. 58–62. (in Russ.)
17. Metodika Gosudarstvennogo sortoispytaniya sel’skokhozyaistvennykh kul’tur (Methodology of the State variety testing of agricultural crops), Moscow: Gosagroprom SSSR, 1989, 162 p.
18. Dospekhov B.A., Metodika polevogo opyta (Methodology of feld experience), Moscow: Agropromizdat, 1985, 365 p.
19. Zhivotkov L.A., Morozova Z.A., Sekatueva L.I., Selektsiya i semenovodstvo, 1994, No. 2, pp. 3–6. (in Russ.)
20. Zykin V.A., Metodika rascheta i otsenki parametrov ekologicheskoi plastichnosti sel’skokhozyaistvennykh rastenii (Methodology for calculating and evaluating the parameters of ecological plasticity of agricultural plants), Ufa, 2005, 100 p.
21. Nikolaev P.N., Anis’kov N.I., Yusova O.A., Safonova I.V., Trudy po prikladnoi botanike, genetike i selektsii, 2018, T. 179, No. 4, pp. 28–38, DOI 10.30901/2227-8834-2019-28-38. (in Russ.)
22. Goncharenko A.A., Vestnik Rossiiskoi akademii sel’skokhozyaistvennykh nauk, 2005, No. 6, pp. 49–53. (in Russ.)
23. Khangil’din V.V., Litvinenko N.A., Nauchno-tekhnicheskii byulleten’ Vsesoyuznogo selektsionnogo-geneticheskogo instituta, 1981, No. 1 (39), pp. 8–14. (in Russ.)
24. Balcha A., Genotype by environment interaction for grain yield and association among stability parameters in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), American Journal of Plant Sciences, 2020, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 1–10, DOI: 10.4236/ajps.2020.111001.
25. Volkova, L.V., Shchennikova I.N., Teoreticheskaya i prikladnaya ekologiya, 2020, No. 3, pp. 140–146, DOI 10.25750/1995-4301-2020-3-140-146. (in Russ.)
26. Korobova N.A., Kozlov A.A., Puchkova E.V., Izvestiya Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta, 2017, No. 3 (65), pp. 41–44. (in Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Musinov K.K., Likhenko I.E., Surnachev A.S. Evaluation of initial material of winter soft wheat in terms of adaptability in the forest-steppe conditions of Novosibirsk region. Bulletin of NSAU (Novosibirsk State Agrarian University). 2022;(1):56-66. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31677/2072-6724-2022-62-1-56-66
Views:
336
Email this article 
