ACUTE CHRONICAL TOXICITY AND INTOLERANCE OF SM - COMPLEX
https://doi.org/10.31677/2072-6724-2019-51-2-96-103
Abstract
The researchers elaborated pharmacological complex of SM at the Chair of Morphology, Physiology and Pharmacology atSouth-UralStateAgrarianUniversity. The complex contains butafosfan, vitamins, vitamin-like substances, selected on the basis of synergistic effect on the body. The parameters of acute toxicity of the SM-complex were explored in the experiment on clinically healthy adult white mice of both genders by a single injection of the solution in the maximum permissible dose according to GOST 31926-2013. Intolerance on the skin of animals was detected in line with GOST R ISO 10993.10-2009. GOST R ISO 10993.10-99 became a guideline for evaluating SM-complex intolerance on the eye conjunctiva. Chronic toxicity was investigated on non-linear rats; the rates were divided into 4 groups of 6. The first group became a control group, the second group received the SM-complex in a therapeutic dose (255mg/kg), the third group - in a 5 -fold therapeutic dose (1275mg/kg), the fourth group - in a 10-fold dose (2550mg/kg). Pharmacological substance was applied through the probe in the form of an aqueous solution for 30 days. The researchers found out that at single oral introduction of SM-complex in the maximum possible doses it does not affect mice organism and it is referred to the 4th class of danger according to GOST 12.1.007-76. Local application in the form of applications on the skin and mucous membranes of rabbits, the complex does not have a local irritant effect. Long-term application of pharmacological composition (30 days) in high doses causes functional and morphological changes of the liver in the form of gray foci and flabbiness, as well as it increases the volume of the organ. Due to the fact that the therapeutic doses are 5 and 10 times lower than the toxic ones and the period of application does not exceed 7-14 days, the authors make a conclusion that SM-complex is safe and secure and can be used in the recommended doses.
About the Authors
A. V. Mifatkhudinov
South-Ural State Agrarian University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Doctor of Biological Sc., Professor
Troitsk
A. S. Aleshina
South-Ural State Agrarian University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
PhD-student
Troitsk
References
1. FisininV.I. Innovatsionnoe obespechenie yaichnogo i myasnogo ptitsevodstva Rossii (Innovative provision of egg and meat poultry farming in Russia) Proceeding of the XVIII International Conference. World Scientific Association for Poultry Farming Russian Branch Scientific Center for Poultry Farming, Sergiev Posad, 2015, pp. 9–25. (In Russ.)
2. Afanas’ev E.V., Rudoi, E.V., Fedyaev P.M. Vestnik Omskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta, 2016, No 2 (22), pp. 268–274. (In Russ.)
3. Alekseev Ya.I., Malyuchenko O.P., Konovalova N.V. Efimov D. N., Emanuilova Zh.V. Ogneva O.A., Fisinin V.I. Izvestiya Timiryazevskoi sel’skokhozyaistvennoi akademii, 2018, No 2, pp.136–144. (In Russ.)
4. Kochish I.I. Veterinariya, zootekhniya i biotekhnologiya, 2018. No 3. pp. 43–47. (In Russ.)
5. Usova T.V.. LantsevaN.N., MotovilovK.Ya., ShvydkovA.N., RyabukhaL.A. Agrarnaya nauka – sel’skokhozyaistvennomu proizvodstvu Sibiri, Kazakhstana, Mongolii, Belarusii i Bolgarii (Agrarian science – agricultural production of Siberia, Kazakhstan, Mongolia, Belarus and Bulgaria) Collection of scientific reports of the XX International Scientific and Practical Conference, Novosibirsk, 2017, pp. 47–51. (In Russ.)
6. Miftakhutdinov A.V., Amineva E.M., Kolobkova N.M., Kolobkov D.M., Agrarnaya nauka, 2018, No 10, pp. 15–19. (In Russ.)
7. Fisinin V.I., Miftakhutdinov A.V., AnosovD.E. Doklady Rossiiskoi akademii sel’skokhozyaistvennykh nauk, 2015, No. 6, pp. 50–53. (In Russ.)
8. Koshchaev A.G., Yurina N.A., Kononenko S.I., Vlasov A.B., Danilova A.A., Maksim E.A. Advancesin Agricuituraland Biological Sciences, 2018, No. 2 (4), pp. 13–20. (In Russ.)
9. Andrianova E., Egorov I., Fisinin V., Grigoryeva E. Lupine in diets for broilers, commercil laying hens, and layer parental flock, Congress Book World’s Poultry Science Association (WPSA), Turkish Branch, 2018, pp. 390–392.
10. Nozdrin G.A., Lelyak A. I. Lelyak., A.A., Yakovleva N. S. Rol» agrarnoy nauki v ustoychivom razvitii sel’skikh territory (The role of agrarian science in the sustainable development of rural areas) The collection of the III All-Russian National Scientific Conference, Novosibirsk, 2018, pp. 768–771. (In Russ.)
11. Kreipe L., Deniz A., Bruckmaier R.M., van Dorland H.A. First report about the mode of action of combined butafosfan and cyanocobalamin on hepatic metabolism in nonketotic early lactating cows, J Dairy Sci, 2011, Oct. 94 (10):4904–4914.
12. Nuber U., van Dorland H.A, Bruckmaier R.M. Effects of butafosfan with or without cyanocobalamin on the metabolism of early lactating cows with subclinical ketosis, J Anim Physiol Anim Nut, Berl. 2016, Feb100 (1):146–55.
13. Mitrokhina A. S. Fundamental’nye osnovy sovremennykh agrarnykh tekhnologii i tekhniki (Fundamentals of modern agricultural technology and technology), Collection of works of the All-Russian Youth Scientific and Practical Conference, Yurga, 2015, pp. 152–155. (In Russ.)
14. Mitrokhina A.S., APK Rossii, Vol. 73, 2015, pp. 156–159. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Mifatkhudinov A.V., Aleshina A.S. ACUTE CHRONICAL TOXICITY AND INTOLERANCE OF SM - COMPLEX. Bulletin of NSAU (Novosibirsk State Agrarian University). 2019;(2):96-103. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31677/2072-6724-2019-51-2-96-103
Views:
451
Email this article 
