INDICATIVE PLANNING OF REGIONAL AGRICULTURE
Abstract
The article declares that planning is basic for production and financial activity in any enterprise. Nowadays the necessity of planning business at the enterprise and in the region is evident, but it should be scientific and apply market indicative mechanism. Indicative planning assumes making decisions, which is aimed at getting the long-term results, changing the environment, preventing from deviations, applying of investment processes and identifying the funding necessary for achieving the expected results and indexes. The international experience reviews indicative planning in two directions; they are “bottom-up” and “top-down”. The bottom-up direction implies state federal level and the top-down direction assumes the economic entity. This process takes place in Russia as top-down process; the other direction is being developed slowly and depends on many terms and conditions. The regions apply data and indexes from the “top” when developing programs, plans and strategies and forward the target indexes “down” taking into account the peculiarities and development of local entities. It means our economy goes back to planning-obligatory indicators of the soviet time. Studying the international experience and experience of the regions in Russia, the authors make conclusion that local authorities, district authorities and the regional ones should participate in strategic and indicative management. All the parts should participate in the market and indicative mechanism of regional management.
About the Authors
A. T. StadnikRussian Federation
S. G. Chernova
Russian Federation
Ten En Dog Ten En Dog
Russian Federation
S. V. Chernov
Russian Federation
References
1. Borisov A. B. Bol’shoy ekonomicheskiy slovar’. Moscow: Kn. mir, 2003. 895 p.
2. Kuznetsov V. V., Gar’kavyy V.V., Domanov G. P. i dr. Nauchnye osnovy formirovaniya normativnoy bazy indikativnogo planirovaniya APK. Rostov na Donu: VNIIEiN, 2000. 56 p.
3. Stadnik A. T., Chernova S. G., Shelkovnikov A. S. Gosudarstvennoe i rynochno-indikativnoe regulirovanie sel’skogo khozyaystva [monografiya]. Novosib. gos. agrar. un-t. Novosibirsk, 2007. 243 p.
4. Matveev D. M. Osvoenie nauchno-tekhnicheskikh dostizheniy v sel’skom khozyaystve: realii i perspektivy [Vestnik AGAU], no. 8 (118) (2014): 187–195.
5. Gritsenko G. M. Indikativnoe planirovanie razvitie malogo predprinimatel’stva sel’skoy territorii: me-todologiya i problemy organizatsii. [Vestnik AGAU], no. 1 (111) (2014): 146–151.
6. Chernova S. G. Osnovnye napravleniya formirovaniya rynochno-reguliruemogo ekonomicheskogo me-khanizma upravleniya APK [Sb. nauch. tr. ekon. fak. NGAU]. Novosibirsk, 2006. pp. 102–105.
7. Stadnik A. T., Chernova S. G., Ten En Dog Sderzhivayushchie faktory innovatsionnogo razvitiya APK regiona i strategiya ego regulirovaniya [Vestnik NGAU], no. 1 (26) (2013): 146–152.
8. Vedomstvennaya tselevaya programma «Razvitie sel’skogo khozyaystva i regulirovanie rynkov sel’skokhozyaystvennoy produktsii v Novosibirskoy oblasti na 2013–2020 gody»: utv. prikazom M-va sel. khoz-va Novosib. obl. 03.08.2012 № 50-npa. Novosibirsk, 2012. 235 p.
9. Rossiyskiy statisticheskiy ezhegodnik, 2013 g.: http://www.gks.ru.
10. Stadnik A. T., Chernova S. G., Essaulenko D. V. Organizatsionnyy mekhanizm vnedreniya innovatsiy v APK na regional’nom urovne [Vestnik NGAU], no. 4 (16) (2010): 128–131.
11. Chernova S. G. Formirovanie i razvitie rynochno-indikativnogo ekonomicheskogo mekhanizma upravleniya sel’skim khozyaystvom [Vestnik. NGAU], no. 4 (33) (2014): 207–210.
Review
For citations:
Stadnik A.T., Chernova S.G., Ten En Dog T., Chernov S.V. INDICATIVE PLANNING OF REGIONAL AGRICULTURE. Bulletin of NSAU (Novosibirsk State Agrarian University). 2015;(2):160-165. (In Russ.)