Preview

Bulletin of NSAU (Novosibirsk State Agrarian University)

Advanced search

MAJOR CONTROL OF ICG PIGS’ PASSIVE-DEFENSIVE BEHAVIOR TO HUMANS

Abstract

The paper explores domestic behavior (associated food and passive-defensive responses to humans) affected by heritage factors and environmental factors of two close generation of mini-pigs bred in ICG of SD RAS. The researchers used a human when feeding animals in groups as an aversive stimulation; individual feeding assumed a presence of human 14-16 hours or 2 hours after feeding. The authors found out phenotypic and genotypic differences of mini-pigs in their fear response to a human. The article ranges the factors according to their contribution to general variations of domestic behavior in the following way: age (0.4 %), gender (0.6 %), social isolation (1.9-2.8 %), boar genotype (13.6 %). The authors discovered inherited discrete polymorphism of mini-pigs, which includes three classes of phenotypes. Age and gender do not affect behavior variability of piglets from their 1.5-month age to puberty. Social isolation influences fear-response of piglets aged 1.5 month. The model of major inheritance controlled by autosomal diallel locus of the main effect FWH describes efficiently various domestic behavior of mini-pigs. The paper makes conclusion that inherited polymorphism of domestic behavior is a new source of adaptive variability for selective adaptation and efficient laboratory mini-pigs.

About the Author

В. Ланкин
Институт цитологии и генетики СО РАН; Новосибирский государственный аграрный университет
Russian Federation


References

1. Тихонов В. Н. Лабораторные мини-свиньи: генетика и медико-биологическое использование / Ин-т цитологии и генетики СО РАН. - Новосибирск, 2010. - 304 с.

2. Станкова Н. В., Капанадзе Г. Д. Селекционно-генетическая и экспериментальная работа с мини-свиньями светлогорской популяции // Биомедицина. - 2012. - № 1. - С. 49-53.

3. Kohn F., Sharifi A. R., Simianer H. Genetic analysis of reactivity to humans in Gottingen minipigs // Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. - 2009. - Vol. 120. - P. 68-75.

4. Genetic selection for coping style predicts stressor susceptibility / A. H. Veenema, O. C. Meijer, E. R. Kloet, J. M. Koolhaas // J. Neuroendocrinol. - 2003. - Vol. 15. - P. 256-267.

5. Application of 3-D imagins sensor for tracking minipigs in the open field test / V. A. Kulikov, N. V. Khostskin, S. V. Nikitin [et al.] // J. Neurosci. Meth. - 2014. - Vol. 235. - P. 219-225.

6. Ланкин В. С. Генетика поведения по отношению к человеку домашних свиней // Докл. РАСХН. - 2008. - № 2. - С. 45-49.

7. Ланкин В. С. Генотипическая и модификационная изменчивость пассивно-оборонительного поведения домашних свиней по отношению к человеку // Вавил. журн. генетики и селекции. - 2013. - Т. 17, № 3. - С. 452-468.

8. Ланкин В. С., Буиссу М. Ф. Факторы изменчивости доместикационного поведения у животных продуктивных видов // Генетика. - 2001. - Т. 37, № 7. - С. 947-961.

9. Фолконер Д. С. Введение в генетику количественных признаков. - М.: Агропромиздат, 1985. - 486 с.

10. Velie B. D., Maltecca C., Cassady J. P. Genetic relationships among pig behavior, growth, backfat, and loin muscle area // J. Anim. Sci. - 2009. - Vol. 87. - P. 2767-2773.


Review

For citations:


  MAJOR CONTROL OF ICG PIGS’ PASSIVE-DEFENSIVE BEHAVIOR TO HUMANS. Bulletin of NSAU (Novosibirsk State Agrarian University). 2015;(4):154-160. (In Russ.)

Views: 173


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2072-6724 (Print)