Evaluation of the effectiveness of the effect of feed based on waste from sugar processing and yeast production on the dairy productivity of cows
https://doi.org/10.31677/2072-6724-2025-76-3-231-240
Abstract
By-products of processing of various industries at an optimal level of their introduction into the diet of farm animals can increase the productivity of farm animals, and can also have a positive effect on metabolic processes in the body. In this regard, the introduction of different levels of sugar processing products and yeast production of domestic production into the diet of lactating cows during the milking period in the amount of 4.11 and 8.22 % in the composition of compound feed was considered, while reducing the proportion of sunflower meal, barley grain, beet pulp and an increase in corn grain. It has been established that the introduction of 8.22 % of the Vinassa feed product in the compound feed increases the uniformity of the fully mixed diet and reduces its separation by animals, which is probably due to its physico-chemical properties. In cows of the second experimental group, during the milking period, an increase in the gross milk yield of 4 % fat content during the milking period by 7.1 % and an increase in the gross milk fat yield by 7.1 % was found (the difference is significant). The introduction of the feed agent “Vinassa” in the amount of 8.22 % in the composition of compound feed during the separation period helps to optimize metabolic processes in the body, as evidenced by the results of a biochemical blood test.
About the Authors
N. P. BuryakovRussian Federation
Doctor of Biological Sciences.
Moscow
M. A. Buryakova
Russian Federation
Candidate of Agricultural Sciences.
Moscow
I. K. Medvedev
Russian Federation
Postgraduate student of the Department of Animal Feeding.
Moscow
A. P. Olesyuk
Russian Federation
Associate Professor of the Department of Dairy and Beef Cattle Breeding.
Moscow
References
1. Zubkova A.S., Davydova M.N., Nauchnyj zhurnal molodyh uchenyh, 2019, No. 3 (16), pp. 9–11. (In Russ.)
2. Zyuzina O.V., Gridneva L.T., Tarankot E.V. [i dr.], Inovatsionnye tekhnologii v APK (Innovative technologies in the agro-industrial complex), Proceedings of the Conference Title, Michurinsk, 2018, pp. 235–238. (In Russ.)
3. Lashkova T.B., Petrova G.V., Puti realizatsii nauchno-tekhnicheskoy programmy razvitiya sel’skogo khozyaystva na 2017–2025 gody (Ways to implement the scientific and technical program for the development of agriculture for 2017–2025), Proceedings of the Conference Title, Lesnikovo, 2018, pp. 534–538. (In Russ.)
4. Funk I.A., Ott E.F., Vestnik NGAU (Novosibirskij gosudarstvennyj agrarnyj universitet), 2023, pp. 302–308. (In Russ.)
5. Martynov V.A., Lomova T.G., Vestnik NGAU (Novosibirskij gosudarstvennyj agrarnyj universitet), 2022, pp. 147–152. (In Russ.)
6. Lyutyh O., Effektivnoe zhivotnovodstvo, 2020, No. 3 (160), pp. 62–67. (In Russ.)
7. Prokof’eva A.A., Bykov A.V., Kvan O.V., Zhivotnovodstvo i kormoproizvodstvo, 2023, T. 106, No. 2, pp. 112–126. (In Russ.)
8. Konyaev N.V., Trubnikov V.N., Vestnik Kurskoj gosudarstvennoj sel’skohozyajstvennoj akademii, 2022, No. 9, pp. 140–146. (In Russ.)
9. Halfen J., Carpinelli N., DelPino F.A.B. et al., Effects of yeast culture supplementation on lactation performance and rumen fermentation profile and microbial abundance in mid-lactation Holstein dairy cows, Journal of Dairy Science, 2021, Vol. 104, Is. 11, pp. 11580–11592.
10. Takiya Caio S., Chesini Rodrigo G., de Freitas Ana Carolina et al., Dietary supplementation with live or autolyzed yeast: Effects on performance, nutrient digestibility, and ruminal fermentation in dairy cows, Journal of Dairy Science Available online, 2024, No. 107 (7), pp. 4495–4508.
11. Schlabitz Cláudia, Lehn Daniel Neutzling, Volken de Souza Claucia Fernanda, A review of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and the applications of its byproducts in dairy cattle feed: Trends in the use of residual brewer\’s yeast, Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022, Vol. 332, pp. 187–201.
12. Dagaew Gamonmas, Wongtangtintharn Sawitree, Prachumchai Rittikeard, Cherdthong Anusorn, The effects of fermented cassava pulp with yeast waste and different roughage-to-concentrate ratios on ruminal fermentation, nutrient digestibility, and milk production in lactating cows, Heliyon, 2023, Vol. 9, Is. 4, pp. 1–9.
13. Evdokimova M.D., Vinogradova A.V., Himiya. Ekologiya. Urbanistika, 2019, No. 1, pp. 382–386. (In Russ.)
14. Cattaneo L., Lopreiato V., Piccioli-Cappelli F. et al., Effect of supplementing live Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast on performance, rumen function, and metabolism during the transition period in Holstein dairy cow, Journal of Dairy Science, 2023, Vol. 106, Is. 6, pp. 4353–4365.
15. Taner Sar, Sharareh Harirchi, Mohaddaseh Ramezani et al., Potential utilization of dairy industries by-products and wastes through microbial processes: A critical review, Science of The Total Environment, 2022, Vol. 810, pp. 1–18.
16. Seidova I.A., Vestnik Omskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta, 2022, No. 1 (45), pp. 139–146. (In Russ.)
17. Baranova I., Zhivotnovodstvo Rossii, 2020, No. 12, pp. 50–53. (In Russ.)
18. Petrova M.Yu., Akif’eva G.E., Kosareva N.A., Vestnik NGAU (Novosibirskij gosudarstvennyj agrarnyj universitet), 2021, No. 4, pp. 50–156. (In Russ.)
19. Uhov M., Zootekhniku i veterinaru, 2022, No. 7 (243), pp. 32–36. (In Russ.)
20. Direct farm: URL: https://direct.farm/post/pensilvanskoye-sito-563, 2022.
21. Rodionov G.V., Olesyuk A.P., Doklady TSHA, Vyp. 292, Chast’ IV, Moscow, 2020, pp. 498–502. (In Russ.)
22. Bogolyubova N.V., Rykov R.A., Uchenye zapiski Kazanskoj gosudarstvennoj akademii veterinarnoj mediciny im. N.E. Baumana, 2019, No. 3 (239), pp. 44–50. (In Russ.)
23. Mkrtchyan G.V., Bojko M.D., Mezhdunarodnyj nauchno-issledovatel’skij zhurnal, 2023, No. 8 (134), pp. 357–360. (In Russ.)
24. Syrcev A., Kombikorma, 2019, No. 5, pp. 75–76. (In Russ.)
25. Nekrasov R.V., Golovin A.V., Mahaev E.A. i dr., Normy potrebnostej molochnogo skota i svinej v pitatel’nyh veshchestvah (Standards of nutrient requirements for dairy cattle and pigs), Moscow, 2018, 290 p.
26. Vandoni S., Korma i veterinariya, 2021, No. 1, pp. 76–80. (In Russ.)
27. Trebuhov A.V., Innovacii i prodovol’stvennaya bezopasnost’, 2019, No. 1 (23), pp. 67–70. (In Russ.)
28. Lashkova T.B., Petrova G.V., Izvestiya Gorskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta, 2018, T. 55, No. 1, pp. 69–73. (In Russ.)
29. Golodyaeva M.S., Gepatoz u korov-pervotelok (diagnostika i profilaktika) (Hepatosis in first-calf cows (diagnosis and prevention)), Dissertation of a candidate of veterinary sciences, Sankt-Peterburg, 2021, 135 p.
30. Omurzakova, N.T. Kurmanbekova G.T., Bejshenalieva S.T. i dr., Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Biologiya, 2018, No. 42, pp. 207–217. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Buryakov N.P., Buryakova M.A., Medvedev I.K., Olesyuk A.P. Evaluation of the effectiveness of the effect of feed based on waste from sugar processing and yeast production on the dairy productivity of cows. Bulletin of NSAU (Novosibirsk State Agrarian University). 2025;(3):231-240. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31677/2072-6724-2025-76-3-231-240
JATS XML


























