Assessment of progeny of flax flax regenerant plants for resistance to anthracnose and increased soil acidity on artificial cultivation backgrounds
https://doi.org/10.31677/2072-6724-2025-76-3-71-83
Abstract
Flax is a strategic crop with wide application in various sectors of the economy, including the production of paints and medical cotton wool. However, diseases and increased soil acidity reduce the yield of flax products. The research conducted in 2021–2024 at the Federal State Budgetary Budgetary Institution “Federal Research Center for Bast Crops” was aimed at evaluating the progeny of flax seedling regenerants obtained as a result of in vitro cell breeding for resistance to anthracnose and increased soil acidity on artificial provocative soils. It was revealed that plants with varying degrees of resistance to anthracnosis were formed on the basis of immature embryos on a selective background in vitro. Studies have made it possible to create new forms of flax genotypes susceptible to the pathogen NO–65, NE-38, NE-36 and NE-16, which showed higher resistance to the pathogen in generations than the original forms. These lines in breeding nurseries were not inferior to the standard Alpha variety in terms of the main indicators of the productivity of the haul, including plant height and weight of the technical part. An analysis of the morphological characteristics of flax plants grown under medium-acidic conditions demonstrated that the NO-65 genotype, the progeny of the R3 regenerate, was the most productive in terms of the number of seeds per plant and the total weight of seeds (43.9 seeds and 6.64 grams, respectively). The genotype has L-2053-6-10 nc R1 is the progeny of the regenerant R1, the maximum height of plants (99.6 cm) and the technical length of the stem (93.4 cm) were recorded, as well as the largest number of boxes per plant unit (9.8 pcs.). This genotype, with its resistance to anthracnose, can be recommended for introduction into production in order to obtain high yields of fiber and seeds. In terms of technical length, the Phoenix pf genotype can be recommended for fiber production in conditions of a medium acidic soil background, and NO–65 for seed production.
About the Authors
V. S. ZotovaRussian Federation
Junior Researcher, Laboratory of Breeding Technologies, Federal Scientific Center of Bast Crops, Postgraduate, Student.
Tver
N. V. Proletova
Russian Federation
Candidate of Biological Sciences, Senior Researcher, Leading Researcher, Laboratory of Breeding Technologies, Federal Scientific Center of Bast Crops.
Tver
E. A. Traburova
Russian Federation
Junior Researcher, Laboratory of Breeding Technologies, Federal Scientific Center of Bast Crops.
Tver
References
1. El Gedwy E.-S.M., Hammam G.Y.M., Allam S.A.H. etc., Straw, Seed Yield and Quality of Three Linum usitatissimum L. Cultivars in Relation to Nitrogen Fertilizer Rate and Plant Density, Asian J. Adv. Agric. Res, 2020,Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 8–29, DOI: 10.9734/ajaar/2020/v14i430137.
2. Stafecka I., Stramkale V., Grauda D., The evaluation of disease resistance of flax genotypein rela-tion to environmental factors, Zemdir-byste, 2019, Vol. 106, No. 4, pp. 367–376, DOI: 10.13080/z-a.2019.106.047.
3. Kishlian N.V., Melnikova N.V., Rozhmina T.A., Trudy po prikladnoy botanike, genetike i selektsii, 2020, Vol. 181, No. 4, pp. 205–212, DOI: 10.30901/2227-8834-2020-4-205-212. (In Russ.)
4. Popova G.A., Polyakova O.I., Rogalskaya N.B. [et al.], Sibirskiy vestnik sel’skokhozyaystvennoy nauki, 2024, Vol. 54, No. 8, pp. 36–47, DOI: 10.26898/0370-8799-2024-8-4. (In Russ.)
5. Grib S.I., Bogdan V.Z., Tavricheskiy vestnik agrarnoy nauki, 2023, No. 1 (33), pp. 6–18, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.7896477. (In Russ.)
6. Rozhmina T.A., Zhuchenko A.A., Melnikova N.V. [et al.], Agrarian Science Euro-Northeast, 2020, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 133–140, DOI: 10.30766/2072-9081.2020.21.2.133-140. (In Russ.)
7. Agegnehu G., Amede T., Erkossa T. et al., Extent and Management of Acid Soils for Sustainable Crop Production System in the Tropical Agroe-cosystems: A Review, Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, 2021, Vol. 71, pp. 852–869, DOI 10.1080/09064710.2021.1954239.
8. Kudryavtseva L.P., Proletova N.V., Siberian Bulletin of Agricultural Science, 2024, Vol. 54, No. 8, pp. 5–13, DOI: 10.26898/0370-8799-2024-8-1. (In Russ.)
9. Abeje G., Zewodu A., Exploring Genetic Variability and Morpho-Agronomic Trait Associations Among Ethiopian Flax (Linum Usitatissi-mum L.) Accessions for Enhanced Fiber and Seed Yield, Journal of Natu-ral Fibers, 2024, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp 19–33, DOI: 10.11648/j.ijbse.20241202.11.
10. Mańkowska G., Mańkowski J., The Influence of Selected Habitat and Agronomic Factors on the Yield of Flax (Linum usitatissimum L.), J. Nat. Fibers, 2020, Vol. 19., No. 6, pp. 2327–2337, DOI: 10.1080/15440478.2020.1810843.
11. Gerasimova E.G., Pavlova L.N., Kudryavtseva L.P. [et al.], Kormoproizvodstvo, 2023, No. 9, pp. 11–15, DOI: 10.25685/KRM.2023.9.2023.010. (In Russ.)
12. Prudnikov V.A., Stepanova N.V., Fesko D.Yu., Sibirskiy vestnik sel’skokhozyaystvennoy nauki, 2024, Vol. 54, No. 10 (311), pp. 141–148, DOI: 10.26898/0370-8799-2024-10-14. (In Russ.)
13. Kudryavtseva L.P., Agrarnaya nauka, 2022, No. 5, pp. 82–86, DOI: 10.32634/0869-8155-2022-359-5-82-86. (In Russ.)
14. Kudryashova T.A., Vinogradova T.A., Kozyakova N.N., Vestnik NGAU (Novosibirskiy gosudarstvennyy agrarnyy universitet), 2020, No. 3 (56), pp. 55–65, DOI: 10.31677/2072-6724-2020-56-3-55-65. (In Russ.)
15. Traburova E.A., Konova A.M., Gavrilova A.Yu. [et al.], Agrarnyy vestnik Urala, 2020, No. 1 (192), pp. 28–34, DOI: 10.32417/1997-4868-2020-192-1-28-34. (In Russ.)
16. Lebedinets V.N., Volkova G.V., Trudy Kubanskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta, 2023, No. 105, pp. 78–88, DOI: 10.21515/1999-1703-105-78-88. (In Russ.)
17. Ponazhev V.P., Pavlova L.N., Rozhmina T.A., Selection and primary seed production of flax (Selection and primary seed production of flax) Tver, 2014, pp. 92–94.
18. Guidelines for selection of flax (for experimental institutions working with flax) (Methodological guidelines for the selection of flax (for experimental institutions working with flax)), Ed. Rogasha A.R., Marchenkova A.N., Torzhok: VNIIL, 1987, 64 p.
19. Guidelines for the selection of flax (Methodological guidelines for the breeding of flax), Moscow, 2004, 44 p.
20. Patent No. 2478282 of the Russian Federation, RU 2478282 C2, 04/10/2013. Method of obtaining flax seed regenerants resistant to anthracnose by in vitro methods: No. 2011115728/10; application dated 04/20/2011, N.V. Proletova, L.P. Kudryavtseva, E.G. Vinogradova, GNU VNIIL of the Russian Agricultural Academy, 4 p. (In Russ.)
21. Proletova N.V., Vestnik Ul’yanovskoy gosudarstvennoy sel’skokhozyaystvennoy akademii, 2021, No. 1 (53), pp. 92– 97, DOI: 10.18286/1816-4501-2021-1-92-97. (In Russ.)
22. Rostovtsev R.A., Chernikov V.G., Oschapovsky I.V. [et al.], Sel’skokhozyaystvennye mashiny i tekhnologii, 2020, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 45–52, DOI: 10.22314/2073-7599-2020-14-3-45-52. (In Russ.)
23. Dospekhov B.A., Metodika polevogo opyta (s osnovami statisticheskoy obrabotki rezul’tatov issledovaniy) (Methodology of field experience (with the basics of statistical processing of research results)), Moscow, 1985, 350 p.
Review
For citations:
Zotova V.S., Proletova N.V., Traburova E.A. Assessment of progeny of flax flax regenerant plants for resistance to anthracnose and increased soil acidity on artificial cultivation backgrounds. Bulletin of NSAU (Novosibirsk State Agrarian University). 2025;(3):71-83. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31677/2072-6724-2025-76-3-71-83


























