Preview

Bulletin of NSAU (Novosibirsk State Agrarian University)

Advanced search

Influence of various protection systems on the level of development of the main phytopathogens of soybean in Khabarovsk krai

https://doi.org/10.31677/2072-6724-2025-74-1-101-111

Abstract

The research work was carried out with the aim of determining the effectiveness of modern biological and chemical soybean protection products against pathogens of root rot and leaf and stem diseases. The work was carried out in 2016-2020, 2022-2023 in grain-soybean crop rotation in soybean crops of the Ivan Karamanov, Batya and Khabarovsky Yubilyar varieties against a natural infectious background. The main diseases in crops during the research years were root rot, septoria, and downy mildew. Pre-sowing treatment of soybean seeds can reduce the development of root rot by 1.4-2.3 times. The most effective technique in the fight against seed and soil infection in soybean crops is the treatment of seeds before sowing with chemical seed treatment agents TMTD with an application rate of 6.0 l/t, Maxim with an application rate of 2.0 l/t, Oplot and Sinclair with an application rate of 0.6 l/t, Deposit with an application rate of 1.2 l/t and Standak Top with an application rate of 1.5 l/t. The most effective protection systems against septoria were those using the complex application of Deposit with an application rate of 1.2 l/t seed treatment with Misteria with an application rate of 1.2 l/ha fungicide treatment of plants, TMTD with an application rate of 3.0 l/t with Zircon with an application rate of 40 ml/t for seed treatment with subsequent Zircon with an application rate of 10 ml/ha treatment of plants during flowering, TMTD with an application rate of 6.0 l/t (seed treatment) with Optimo with an application rate of 0.5 l/ha (plant treatment), as well as Zircon with an application rate of 40 ml/t and 10 ml/ha, Extrasol with an application rate of 2.0 l/t and 2.0 l/ha and Nutri-Fight with an application rate of 0.75 l/ha bioagents. The use of Standak Top with an application rate of 1.5 l/t as a seed treatment agent and Pictor Active with an application rate of 0.6 l/ha for treating vegetative plants reduced the incidence of downy mildew in plants by 4,6 times; TMTD for seed treatment and Optimo for spraying plants – by 3,6 times; pre-sowing TMTD with an application rate of 6.0 l/t seed treatment with subsequent Zircon with an application rate of 10 ml/ha treatment of plants during flowering – by 2,9 times, and pre-sowing seed treatment with subsequent Zircon with an application rate of 40 ml/t and 10 ml/ha treatment of plants – by 2,6 times.

About the Authors

A. G. Tishkova
Federal State Budgetary Institution of Science Khabarovsk Federal Research Center of the Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences Far Eastern Research Institute of Agriculture
Russian Federation

research fellow

Khabarovsk Krai



T. A. Aseeva
Federal State Budgetary Institution of Science Khabarovsk Federal Research Center of the Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences Far Eastern Research Institute of Agriculture
Russian Federation

Doctor of Agricultural Sciences, Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Khabarovsk Krai



References

1. Shul’ga T.V., Selyuk M.P., Aktual’nye problemy agronomii sovremennoi Rossii i puti ikh resheniya (Current problems of agronomy in modern Russia and ways to solve them), Proceedings of the Conference Title, 2018, Voronezh, 2018, pp. 172–178. (In Russ.)

2. Shepel’ O.L., Aseeva T.A., Zvolimbovskaya M.P., Dostizheniya nauki i tekhniki APK, 2020, T. 34, No. 8, pp. 16–22, DOI: 10.24411/0235-2451-2020-10802. (In Russ.)

3. Aseeva T.A., Vestnik KrasGAU, 2008, No. 3, pp. 109–113. (In Russ.)

4. Piskunov K.S., Rassokhin P.V., Kocheva N.S., Agrarnyi vestnik Primor’ya, 2020, No. 3(19), pp. 22–25. (In Russ.)

5. Tishkova A.G., Aseeva T.A., Dostizheniya nauki i tekhniki APK, 2023, No. 6(37), pp. 50–54, DOI: 10.53859/02352451_2023_37_6_50. (In Russ.)

6. Shabaldas O.G., Pimonov K.I., Shutko A.P., Bezgina Yu.A., Agrarnyi nauchnyi zhurnal, 2023, No.10, pp. 80–86, DOI: 10.28983/asj.y2023i10pp80-86. (In Russ.)

7. Ivantsova E.A., Fermer. Chernozem’e, 2017, No. 2(2), pp. 42–44. (In Russ.)

8. Kadurov A.A., Zaostrovnykh V.I., Sovremennye problemy i perspektivy agropromyshlennogo kompleksa Sibiri (Current problems and prospects of the agro-industrial complex of Siberia), Proceedings of the Conference Title, Kemerovo, 2017, pp. 24–32. (In Russ.)

9. Lin H.A., Mideros S.X., Accurate quantification and detection of Septoria glycines in soybean using quantitative PCR, Current Plant Biology, 2021, No. 25, 100192, DOI: 10.1016/j.cpb.2020.100192.

10. Tishkova A.G., Aseeva T.A., Zolotareva E.V., Dostizheniya nauki i tekhniki APK, 2016, T. 30, No. 12, pp. 36–39. (In Russ.)

11. Tishkova A.G., Agroecological techniques for protecting soybean crops from phytopathogens, IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2020, No. 547, 012044, DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/547/1/012044.

12. Toropova E.Yu., Kamenev I.A., Vestnik NGAU (Novosibirskii gosudarstvennyi agrarnyi universitet), 2024, No. 1(70), pp. 161–168, DOI: 10.31677/2072-6724-2024-70-1-161-168. (In Russ.)

13. Budarina G.A., Zernobobovye i krupyanye kul’tury, 2018, No. 3(27), pp. 47–52, DOI: 10.24411/2309-348X-2018-11031. (In Russ.)

14. Kurilova D.A., Bushneva N.A., Maslichnye kul’tury, 2023, No. 3(195), pp. 76–82, DOI: 10.25230/2412-608X-2023-3-195-76-82. (In Russ.)

15. Kazantseva E.V., Ashmarina L.F., Vestnik NGAU (Novosibirskii gosudarstvennyi agrarnyi universitet), 2014, No. 3(32), pp. 27–31. (In Russ.)

16. Popova O.V., Salmanova I.A., Rukin V.F., Zashchita soi ot vrednykh organizmov (Protecting soybeans from pests), Voronezh, 2015, 60 p.

17. Gavrilov A.A., Shutko A.P., Maryuhina A.G., Fitosanitarnaya diagnostika boleznej rastenij (Phytosanitary diagnostics of plant diseases), Stavropol’, 2004, 76 р.

18. Dospekhov B.A., Metodika polevogo opyta (Field experiment methodology), Moscow: Agropromizdat, 1985, 351 p.

19. Novosadov I.N., Dubovitskaya L.K., Polozhieva Yu.V., Diagnostika boleznei soi (Diagnosis of soybean diseases), Blagoveshchensk, 2017, 62 p.


Review

For citations:


Tishkova A.G., Aseeva T.A. Influence of various protection systems on the level of development of the main phytopathogens of soybean in Khabarovsk krai. Bulletin of NSAU (Novosibirsk State Agrarian University). 2025;(1):101-111. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31677/2072-6724-2025-74-1-101-111

Views: 66


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2072-6724 (Print)