Ethological profile and productivity of suckling sows in terms of industrial technology
https://doi.org/10.31677/2072-6724-2024-73-4-215-219
Abstract
The analysis of animal behavior, in particular suckling sows, allows us to identify problems of their well-being and health at the initial stages, which ensures an increase in reproductive productivity and profitability of the herd. Most often, the individual characteristics of animals associated with the type of higher nervous activity remain beyond the attention of breeders. The assessment of behavioral reactions of suckling sows with different levels of reproductive qualities (multiple fertility, lactation (nest weight at 21 days), the number of piglets in the nest at 2 months) during the period of the highest daily activity was carried out. The time spent by the sow on feeding piglets, motor activity, rest, feeding, research behavior, urination and defecation were recorded. As a result of the studies, no behavioral abnormalities were found in lactating sows that reduce their well-being, as indicated by the percentage distribution of animal activity types. A significant share in the ethological profile of animals was occupied by rest, the values of which ranged from 33.3 to 45.8%. Motor activity accounted for 10.4 to 20.8% of the studied time budget. On average, a sow spent a third of the daily activity budget on feeding and feeding piglets. The tendency to an advantage in feeding time of piglets of more fertile and dairy sows over the rest is shown. Suckling sows with productivity indicators above the average values in the sample were characterized by slightly less research activity, which probably reflects their individual characteristics.
About the Authors
M. L. KochnevaRussian Federation
Doctor of Biological Sciences, Professor
Novosibirsk
K. V. Zhuchaev
Russian Federation
Doctor of Biological Sciences, Professor
Novosibirsk
E. A. Borisenko
Russian Federation
Candidate of Biological Sciences, Associate Professor
Novosibirsk
S. V. Papshev
Russian Federation
Candidate of Agricultural Sciences
Mikhaylovka, Primorsky Krai
References
1. Zhuchaev K.V., Jejlert A.I., Rep’juk D.V., Ivanova O.A., Kochneva M.L., Pobegajlo I.M., Innovacii i prodovol’stvennaja bezopasnost’, 2017, No. 4 (18), pp. 32–38. (In Russ.)
2. Sulimova L.I., Zhuchaev K.V., Kochneva M.L., Sel’skohozjajstvennaja biologija, 2020, No. 55 (2), pp. 209–224. (In Russ.)
3. Papshev S.V., Zhuchaev K.V., Barsukova M.A., Sel’skohozjajstvennaja biologija, 2000, No. 2, pp. 20. (In Russ.)
4. Soljanik A.N., Hodosovskij D.N., Hochenkov A A., Bezmen V.A., Petrushko A.S., Rudakovskaja I.I., Matjushonok T.A., Aktual’nye problemy intensivnogo razvitija zhivotnovodstva, 2020, No. 23 (2), pp. 125–133. (In Russ.)
5. Gebregeziabhear E., Ameha N., Zeit D., Dawa D. [et al.], The effect of stress on productivity of animals: a review, Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare, 2015, No. 5 (3), pp. 165–172.
6. Suetov N.V., Zhuchaev K.V., Kaufmann O., Vestnik NGAU (Novosibirskij gosudarstvennyj agrarnyj universitet), 2011, No. 3 (19), pp. 66–71. (In Russ.)
7. Dar’in A.I., Cifrovizacija v APK: tehnologicheskie resursy, novye vozmozhnosti i vyzovy vremeni, Collection of scientific papers, 2020, pp. 165–167. (In Russ.)
8. Welfare Quality® assessment protocol for pigs (sows and piglets, growing and finishing pigs), Welfare Quality® Consortium, Lelystad, the Netherlands, 2009.
9. Hemsworth P.H., Pedersen V., Cox M. [et al.], A note on the relationship between the behavioural response of lactating sows to humans and the survival of their piglets, Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 1999, Vol. 65 (1), pp. 43–52.
10. Hemsworth P.H., Barnett J.L., Hofmeyr C. [et al.], The effects of fear of humans and pre-slaughter handling on the meat quality of pigs, Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 2002, Vol. 53 (4), pp. 493–501.
11. Mota-Rojas D., Broom D.M., Orihuela A. [et al.], Effects of human-animal relationship on animal productivity and welfare, Journal of Animal Behaviour and Biometeorology, 2020, Vol. 8 (3), pp. 196–205.
12. Boyle L.A., Edwards S.A., Bolhuis J.E. [et al.], The evidence for a causal link between disease and damaging behavior in pigs, Frontiers in veterinary science, 2022, Vol. 8, pp. 771682.
13. Soljanik A.N., Shejko I.P., Hodosovskij D.N., Hochenkov A.A., Petrushko A.S., Rudakovskaja I.I., Dzhumkova M.V., Doklady Nacional’noj akademii nauk Belarusi, 2022, No. 66 (3), pp. 377–384. (In Russ.)
14. Shackaja A.N., Hodosovskij D.N., Hochenkov A.A., Bezmen V.A., Petrushko A.S., Rudakovskaja I.I., Matjushonok T.A., Uchenye zapiski uchrezhdenija obrazovanija «Vitebskaja ordena «Znak Pocheta» gosudarstvennaja akademija veterinarnoj mediciny»: nauchno-prakticheskij zhurnal, 2013, Vol. 49 (2), pp. 330–333. (In Russ.)
15. Komlackij V.I., Povedenie svinej v uslovijah intensivnogo vedenija otrasli (Behavior of pigs in intensive farming conditions), Krasnodar, 1985, pp. 80. (In Russ.)
16. Bazhov G.M., Stepanova O.V., Politematicheskij setevoj jelektronnyj nauchnyj zhurnal Kubanskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta, 2012, No. 77, pp. 677–686. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Kochneva M.L., Zhuchaev K.V., Borisenko E.A., Papshev S.V. Ethological profile and productivity of suckling sows in terms of industrial technology. Bulletin of NSAU (Novosibirsk State Agrarian University). 2024;(4):215-219. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31677/2072-6724-2024-73-4-215-219