Qualitative indicators of spring wheat varieties in the conditions of the Krasnoyarsk forest-steppe

The objectives of the research are to study the reliability criterion of spring wheat varieties in terms of yield, weight of 1000 grains, resistance to lodging, duration of the growing season and technological parameters protein and gluten content. One-sided selection aimed at increasing productivity reduces the adaptability of varieties. In this regard, there is a need for economic and biological assessment of varieties, which will allow the adaptability of spring wheat to be fully realized in the Krasnoyarsk Territory. The location of the study is the Uyarsky GSU, located in the forest-steppe zone of the Krasnoyarsk Territory. Qualitative analysis was carried out in the zonal Krasnoyarsk chemical-technological laboratory for variety testing of agricultural crops in 2019–2021. Objects of study: 21 varieties of spring wheat, incl. 19 varieties of spring soft wheat of different ripeness groups and 2 varieties of spring durum wheat. In terms of yield, the best results (more than 7.0 t/ha) were obtained from the bread wheat varieties Extra (early ripening); Novosibirskaya 41 (mid-early); Gonets, Omskaya 44, Kuraginskaya 2, Predgornaya (mid-season); Leader 80, Union (mid-late); as well as in Omsk steppe durum wheat. Data processing according to the method proposed by D.A. Saprygin, made it possible to carry out a comprehensive analysis of spring wheat varieties using yield, weight of 1000 grains, resistance to lodging, duration of the growing season, protein and gluten content in the grain. Based on the results of this analysis, we can say that the reliability criterion (Kn) is the highest for the bread wheat varieties Novosibirskaya 15, Novosibirskaya 16 (early ripening), Novosibirskaya 31, Novosibirskaya 41, Pamyati Vavenkova (mid-early), Gonets, Omskaya 44 (mid-ripening), Leader 80 , Belukha, Union (mid-late varieties) (soft wheat), as well as durum wheat Omsk steppe.

1. Fatyhov I.Sh., Islamova Ch.M., Kolesnikova E.Yu., Vestnik Bashkirskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta, 2020, No. 1 (53), pp. 44–50. (In Russ.)

2. Mozgovoy S.S., Pantyukhov I.V., Keler V.V., Vestnik KrasGAU, 2020, No. 9 (162), pp. 121–128. (In Russ.)

3. Kir’yakova M.N., Yusov V.S., Evdokimov M.G., Vestnik NGAU (Novosibirskiy gosudarstvennyy agrarnyy universitet), 2023, No. 2 (67), pp. 44–50. (In Russ.)

4. Aseeva T.A. [i dr.], Vestnik DVO RAN, 2016, No. 2 (186), pp. 64–70. (In Russ.)

5. Prjanishnikov A.I., Nauchnyje osnovy adaptivnoj selekcii v Povolzhyje (Scientific foundations of adaptive breeding in the Volga region), Moscow: RAN, 2018, 96 p.

6. Amelin A.V., Chekalin E.I., Zaikin V.V., Mazalov V.I., Gorodov V.T., Ikusov R.A., Vestnik agrarnoj nauki, 2019, No. 2 (77), pp. 3–11. (In Russ.)

7. Djomina I.F., Agrarnaya nauka Evro-Severo-Vostoka, 2022, No. 4 (23), pp. 433–440. (In Russ.)

8. Volkova L.V., Metody i tehnologii v selekcii rastenij i rastenievodstve (Methods and technologies in plant breeding and crop production), Proceeding of bthe Conference Title, Kirov, 2022, pp. 47–52. (In Russ.)

9. Chekmarjov V.V., Zernovoe khozyaystvo Rossii, 2012, No. 1, pp. 46–51. (In Russ.)

10. Shabolkina E.N., Chichkin A.P., Zernovoe khozyaystvo Rossii, 2012, No. 1, pp. 102–111. (In Russ.)

11. Metodika gosudarstvennogo sortoispytanija selskohozjajstvennyh kultur (Methodology of state variety testing of agricultural crops), Vyp. 1, Obshchaja chast, Мoscow, 2019, 329 s.

12. Metodika gosudarstvennogo sortoispytanija selskohozjajstvennyh kultur (Methodology of state variety testing of agricultural crops), Vyp. 2. Zernovyje, krupjanyje, zernobobovyje, kukuruza i kormovyje kultury, Мoscow, 1989, 194 p.

13. Seljaninov G.T., Trudy o selskohozjajstvennoj meteorologii, 1928, Vyp. 20, pp. 169–178. (In Russ.)

14. Dospekhov B.A., Metodika polevogo opyta (Field experiment methodology), Moscow: Agropromizdat, 1985, 351 p.

15. Galeev R.R., Samarin I.S., Andreeva Z.V., Vestnik NGAU (Novosibirskiy gosudarstvennyy agrarnyy universtet), 2017, No. 4 (45), pp. 9–15. (In Russ.)

16. Razina A.A., Boyarkin E.V., Dyatlova O.G., Vestnik KrasGAU, 2022, No. 9, pp. 67–73, DOI: 10.36718/18194036-2022-9-67-73. (In Russ.)

17. Fedosenko D.F., Sibirskie obraztsy yarovoy myagkoy pshenitsy kak iskhodnyy material dlya selektsii v usloviyakh Krasnoyarskoy lesostepi (Siberian samples of spring soft wheat as source material for selection in the conditions of the Krasnoyarsk forest-steppe), dis. candidate of Agricultural Sciences, Krasnoyarsk, 2021, 145 p.

18. Metod funktsional’nogo kriteriya nadezhnosti sortov yarovoy pshenitsy dlya massovogo proizvodstva (Method of functional criterion of reliability of spring wheat varieties for mass production), Sib. Research Institute of Crop Production and Breeding, Novosibirsk: VASHNIL, 1984, 39 p.

19. Baykalova L.P., Serebrennikov Yu.I., Vestnik KrasGAU, 2023, No. 8, pp. 3–11, DOI: 10.36718/18194036-2023-8-3-11. (In Russ.)