Preview

Bulletin of NSAU (Novosibirsk State Agrarian University)

Advanced search

Influence of behavior and conditions on feed costs of young american mink Standard dark brown

https://doi.org/10.31677/2072-6724-2024-70-1-230-236

Abstract

The study continues the theme of studying the role of environment and behavior in shaping the productivity of caged fur-bearing animals. In the “human-animal” relationship, the advantage of animals with moderately aggressive behavior in the cost of food per unit of body growth during growth and development is shown in pairs and individually. Pair rearing of growing young mink is more expensive than individual rearing since it, as previously shown, is entirely stressful. Under these conditions, the restructuring of behavior in the process of selection of the American mink for a defensive reaction to humans is accompanied by a sharp increase in variability in many traits, in this case, food consumption per unit of body weight gain during the period of growth and development, which, it would seem, are not directly related to behavior. The work was carried out at the Institute of Cytology and Genetics of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences experimental fur farm. The genotypes used in the study were Standard Dark Brown (+/+) mink. The main evaluation criterion is the feed cost per unit of body weight gain. The study found that when kept in mixed-sex pairs, the lowest feed costs were found in males with moderately aggressive behavior (34.80 ± 1.20 g). In the most tame type, the maximum feed consumption per unit of body weight gain is noted (95.60 ± 8.90 g). Food consumption is lower in the most aggressive type than in the tamest behavior (32.30±0.03 and 35.40±1.00 g). Individual keeping of young American mink ensures more efficient use of food in both males and females of aggressive and tame behavior.

About the Authors

M. A. Nekrasova
Novosibirsk State Agrarian University
Russian Federation

M.A. Nekrasova, Researcher 

Novosibirsk



M. A. Stepanova
Novosibirsk State Agrarian University
Russian Federation

M.A. Stepanova, PhD student 

Novosibirsk



Z. N. Alekseeva
Novosibirsk State Agrarian University
Russian Federation

Z.N. Alekseeva, Doctor of Agricultural Sciences, Professor 

Novosibirsk



References

1. Clausen T.N., Lassen T.M., Larsen P.F. Effect of reduced protein in the growth and furring period in 2010 and 2011 in mink, Proceedings of the Xth International Scientific Congress in fur animal production. Scientific, Copenhagen, Denmark 21-24/08/2012. IFASA CONGRESS. August 21-24, 2012. Copenhagen, Denmark. September 7-10; Wageningen Academic Publishers. The Netherlands, 2012, Vol. 36 (3/4), pp. 47–53.

2. Rastimeshina O.V., Demina T.M., Vavilovskij zhurnal genetiki i selekcii, 2014, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 240–244. (In Russ.)

3. Alemu S.W., Bijma P., Møller S.H., Janss L., Berg P., Indirect genetic effects contribute substantially to heritable variation in aggression-related traits in group-housed mink (Neovison vison), Genetics Selection Evolution, 2014, Vol. 46, pp. 1–11.

4. Hansen S.W., Møller S.H., Damgaard B.M., Bite marks in mink Induced experimentally and as reflection of aggressive encounters between mink, Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 2014, Vol. 158, pp. 76–85.

5. Dallaire J.A., Mason G.J., Juvenile rough-and-tumble play predicts adult sexual behaviour in American mink, Animal Behaviour, 2017, Vol. 123, pp. 81–89.

6. Abramov M.D., Norkovodstvo (Mink farming), Moscow: Kolos, 1974, 208 p.

7. Hansen S.W., Møller S.H., Mink’s adaptation to group housing in practice, Proceedings of the Xth International Scientific Congress in fur animal production, Wageningen Academic Publishers, 2012, Vol. 36 (3/4), pp. 350–359.

8. Malmkvist J., Stress influencing production and welfare in farmed mink, Proceedings of the Xth International Scientific Congress in fur animal production, Wageningen Academic Publishers, 2012, Vol. 36 (3/4), pp. 315–327.

9. Rousing T., Møller S.H., Hansen S.W., WelFur-mink: on-farm welfare assessment of mink (Neovision vision)-effect of sample size on animal based measures, Proceedings of the Xth International Scientific Congress in fur animal production, Wageningen Academic Publishers, 2012, Vol. 36 (3/4), pp. 420–425.

10. Møller S.H., Lessons learned from not fattening juvenile mink kept as future breeders, Proceedings of the Xth International Scientific Congress in fur animal production, Wageningen Academic Publishers, 2012, Vol. 36 (3/4), pp. 479-479.

11. Trapezov O.V., Trapezova L.I., Informatsionnyi vestnik VOGiS, 2009, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 554–570. (In Russ.)

12. Trapezov O.V., Genetika, 1987, Vol. 23, No. 6, pp. 1120–1127. (In Russ.)

13. Perel’dik N.Sh., Milovanov L.V., Erin A.T., Kormlenie pushnyh zverej (Fur animals feeding), Moscow: Kolos, 1981, 335 p. (In Russ.)

14. Gulevich R.G., Os’kina I.N., Harlamova A.V., Trapezov O.V., Zhurnal jevoljucionnoj biohimii i fiziologii, 2000, Vol. 36, No. 5, pp. 410–413. (In Russ.)

15. Naumenko E.V., Popova N.K., Ivanova L.N., Genetika, 1987, Vol. 23, No. 6, pp. 1011–1025. (In Russ.)

16. Beljaev D. K., Priroda, 1979, No. 2, pp. 36–45. (In Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Nekrasova M.A., Stepanova M.A., Alekseeva Z.N. Influence of behavior and conditions on feed costs of young american mink Standard dark brown. Bulletin of NSAU (Novosibirsk State Agrarian University). 2024;(1):230-236. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31677/2072-6724-2024-70-1-230-236

Views: 230


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2072-6724 (Print)