Assessment of the selection structure of the kazakh white-headed cattle herd

   In the breeding farm Kolos LLC in the Altai Territory, which is engaged in the breeding and selecting Kazakh white-headed cattle, bulls were assessed by their productivity, sires by the quality of their offspring, lines, breeding and production groups. It has been established that, regardless of which trait is taken as the base one, the bulls of the selection group exhibit highly productive qualities. Analysis of correlation coefficients allows us to note a strong connection between live weight and average daily gain, feed costs, assessment of meat qualities, relative gain, and the “A” index. A comparative evaluation of stud bulls based on the quality of their offspring indicates that the sons of Zaur 70099, Pankrat 6809, and Simons 6633 are improvers. When assessing the genealogical structure, the best indicators are shown by bulls belonging to the line of Castle 3335. When comparatively evaluating the strength of the influence of the line and the sire bull on the variability of traits, it was established that the stability of the impact of the sire bull is, as a rule, higher than the influence of the line and for the most critical traits it is more than two times. The highest power of the sire’s influence is noted for such characteristics as live weight, average daily gain, assessment of meat qualities, and complex index “A”. The population of the Kazakh white-headed breed has a high selection potential in assessing animal gene pool and phenol. Also, it has an optimal level of genetic variability of traits, expressed through the strength of the sire’s influence on the variability of traits.

1. Kryuchkov V.D., Zhuzenov Sh.A., Bozymov K.K., Nasambaev E.G., Akhmetalieva A.B., Tumenov A.N., Vestnik myasnogo skotovodstva, 2011, Vol. 1, No. 64, pp. 26–33. (In Russ.)

2. Bozymov K.K., Abzhanov R.K., Akhmetalieva A.B., Vestnik Bashkirskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta, 2013, No. 3 (27), pp. 63–66. (In Russ.)

3. Khainatskii V.Yu., Gontyurev V.A., Dzhulamanov K.M., Iskanderova A.P., Tyulebaev S.D., Molochnoe i myasnoe skotovodstvo, 2020, No. 2, pp. 7–10. (In Russ.)

4. Gontyurev V.A., Makaev Sh.A., Iskanderova A.P., Kapitsa E.A., Vestnik myasnogo skotovodstva, 2013, No. 1 (79), pp. 33–37. (In Russ.)

5. Gumerov M.B., Gorelik O.V., Zernina S.G., Izvestiya Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta, 2018, No. 51, pp. 139–144. (In Russ.)

6. Sheveleva O.M., Vestnik KrasGAU, 2006, No. 10, pp. 182–185. (In Russ.)

7. Pustotina G.F., Izvestiya Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta, 2005, No. 1 (5), pp. 112–113. (In Russ.)

8. Popov A.M., Kalashnikov I.A., Nasatuev B.D., Vestnik Buryatskoi gosudarstvennoi sel’skokhozyaistvennoi akademii im. V.R. Filippova, 2011, No. 4 (25), pp. 47–53. (In Russ.)

9. Kudrin A.G., Molochnokhozyaistvennyi vestnik, 2013, No. 3 (11), pp. 10–15. (In Russ.)

10. Kozlova N.N., Gosteva E.R., Zamygin S.N., Ulimbashev M.B., Sbornik nauchnykh trudov Krasnodarskogo nauchnogo tsentra po zootekhnii i veterinarii, 2019, T. 8, No. 2, pp. 11–16. (In Russ.)

11. Zharkenova Yu.Yu., Gumerov M.B., Rebezov M.B., Kharlap S.Yu., Molodezh’ i nauka, 2019, No. 7–8, pp. 48. (In Russ.)

12. Dubovskova M.P., Vse o myase, 2011, No. 1, pp. 11–13. (In Russ.)

13. Nasambaev E.G., Yuldashbaev Yu.A., Akhmetalieva A.B., Nugmanova A.E., Batyrgaliev E.A., Dostizheniya nauki i tekhniki APK, 2020, T. 34, No. 8, pp. 99–102. (In Russ.)

14. Nasambaev E., Nugmanova A.E., Tolep T., Vestnik nauki, 2020, T. 1, No. 6 (27), pp. 249–263. (In Russ.)

15. Gontyurev V.A., Makaev Sh.A., Vestnik myasnogo skotovodstva, 2014, No. 4 (87), pp. 39–42. (In Russ.)

16. Kovaleva G.P., Bobryshova G.T., Sel’skokhozyaistvennyi zhurnal, 2020, No. 4 (13), pp. 36–41. (In Russ.)

17. Kharchenko A.V., Feizullaev F.R., Lepekhina T.V., Innovatsionnaya nauka, 2022, No. 6–1, pp. 59–61. (In Russ.)

18. Gerasimov R.P., Zhivotnovodstvo i kormoproizvodstvo, 2022, T. 105, No. 2, pp. 28–36. (In Russ.)

19. Gontyurev V.A., Iskanderova A.P., Khristianovskii P.I., Belousov A.M., Izvestiya Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta, 2019, No. 6 (80), pp. 273–276. (In Russ.)

20. Makaev Sh.A., Lyapin O.A., Taiguzin R.Sh., Izvestiya Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta, 2019, No. 3 (77), pp. 235–237. (In Russ.)

21. Makaev Sh.A., Lyapin O.A., Taiguzin R.Sh., Izvestiya Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta, 2020, No. 2 (82), pp. 212–217. (In Russ.)

22. Prakhov L.P., Lushnikov I.V., Savina D.G. i dr., Otsenka bykov myasnykh porod po kachestvu potomstva i ispytanie bychkov po intensivnosti rosta, zhivoi masse, myasnym formam (Evaluation of bulls of meat breeds for the quality of offspring and testing of bulls for growth intensity, live weight, meat forms), Moscow: Agropromizdat, 1990, 17 p.

23. Filipchenko Yu.A., Izmenchivost’ i metody izucheniya (Variability and study methods), Moscow: Librokom, 2012, 232 p.

24. Plokhinskii N.A., Rukovodstvo po biometrii dlya zootekhnikov (A Guide to Biometrics for Animal Scientists), Moscow: Kolos, 1969, 255 p.

25. Stalh W., Rasch D., Šiler R., Vahal J., Populationsgenetik für tierzüchter, Berlin-Prag, 1969,439 p.