Preview

Bulletin of NSAU (Novosibirsk State Agrarian University)

Advanced search

Comparative assessment of yield and adaptive potential of pea and soybean varieties in the conditions of the northern foreststeppe zone of Northern Trans-Urals

https://doi.org/10.31677/2072-6724-2023-68-3-101-110

Abstract

The research aims to comprehensively assess pea and soybean varieties based on their ranking by yield and adaptive parameters in the conditions of the northern forest-steppe zone of the Tyumen region for the years 2019-2021. The authors identified the significant environmental variability during the years of variety testing. The best pea variety in terms of average yield and average yield in contrasting conditions was Ostinato (33.8 and 36.9 c/ha, respectively), while for soybean, it was the Siberiada variety (13.2 and 11.9 c/ha, respectively). The realisation of yield potential was low for all varieties and did not exceed 75%. Pea varieties outperformed soybean varieties regarding 1000 grain weight and plant height. The vegetation period for soybean varieties was 25-30 days longer than for pea varieties. All sorts exhibited high resistance to lodging. Stress resistance was low for all types, especially peas, ranging from -11.8 for the Siberian variety to -20.0 c/ha for the Ostinato pea. Yield variability among varieties ranged from 33.4% (Ostinato pea variety) to 53.4% (SibNIISK-315 soybean variety). The regression coefficient for all pea and soybean varieties was equal to or close to one, from bi = 0.96 (Siberiachka soybean variety) to bi = 1.04 (Ostinato pea variety and Siberiada soybean variety), indicating their plasticity. Soybean varieties exceeded pea varieties in terms of homeostasis. The best for peas in this indicator was the Ostinato variety (Hоm = 5.06), and for soybeans, it was the Siberiada variety (Hоm = 2.06). The pea variety Ostinato (2.4) and the soybean variety Siberiada (0.8) demonstrated the highest overall adaptive ability. Based on the sum of rankings for yield and adaptability parameters, the best pea variety was Ostinato (sum of orders 11). For soybeans, it was the Siberiada variety (sum of rankings 11).

About the Authors

V. A. Sapega
Tyumen Industrial University
Russian Federation

Doctor of Agricultural Sciences, Professor

Tyumen



G. Sh. Tursumbekova
Northern Trans-Urals State Agricultural University
Russian Federation

Doctor of Agricultural Sciences, Professor

Tyumen



References

1. Ashiev A.R., Habibullin K.N., Chegunova A.V., Skulova M.V., Zernovoe hozyajstvo Rossii, 2021, No. 4 (76), pp. 45–49. (In Russ.)

2. Shukis S.K., Shukis E.R., Drobyshev A.P., Vestnik Altajskogo GAU, 2021, No. 9 (203), pp. 36–43. (In Russ.)

3. Vasyakin N.I., Zernobobovye kul'tury v Zapadnoj Sibiri (Leguminous crops in Western Siberia), Novosibirsk: RASHN, Sib. otdelenie, 2002, 184 p.

4. Davletov F.A., Nigmatullina G.M., Gajnullina K.P., Pleshkov A.V., Safin F.F., Zernovoe hozyajstvo Rossii, 2020, No. 2 (68), pp. 61–65. (In Russ.)

5. Temirov K.S., Salmina I.S., Domanskaya M.K., Sibrskij vestnik s.-h nauki, 2016, No. 5, pp. 21– 27. (In Russ.)

6. Tavares C.J., Riberio Junior W.Q., Ramos M.L.G. [et al.], Water stress alters morphophysiological grain quality and vegetation indices of soybean cultivars, Plants, 2022, Vol. 11 (4), pp. 559.

7. Zotikov V.I., Sidorenko V.S., Gryadunova N.V., Zernobobovye i krupyanye kul'tury, 2018, No. 2 (26), pp. 4–10. (In Russ.)

8. Ashiev A.R., Habibullin K.N., Skulova M.V., Zernovoe hozyajstvo Rossii, 2019, No. 6 (66), pp. 7–11. (In Russ.)

9. Petibskaya V.S., Soya: himicheskij sostav i ispol'zovanie (Soybean: chemical composition and use), Majkop: OAO Poligraf-Yug, 2012, 61 p.

10. Bajkunirova A.K., Grigorchuk N.F., Vestnik Altajskogo GAU, 2022, No. 4 (210), pp. 5–10. (In Russ.)

11. Pereira H.S., Alvares R.C., Silva F.C., de Faria L.C., Melo L.C., Genetic environmental and genotype environment interaction effects on the common bean grain yield and commercial quality, Semina: Ciencias Agrarias, 2017, Vol. 38 (3), pp. 1241–1250.

12. Goncharenko A.A., Zernovoe hozyajstvo Rossii, 2016, No. 2 (44), pp. 31–36. (In Russ.)

13. Sapega V.A., Rossijskaya sel'skohozyajstvennaya nauka, 2015, No. 5, pp. 14–17. (In Russ.)

14. Sapega V.A., Mitrikovsky A.Ya., Vestnik Kazanskogo GAU, 2020, No. 2 (58), pp. 49–52. (In Russ.)

15. Musinov K.K., Lihenko I.E., Surnachev A.S., Vestnik NGAU, 2022, No. 1 (62), pp. 56–66. (In Russ.)

16. Ashiev A.R., Habibullin K.N., Skulova M.V., Zernovoe hozyajstvo Rossii, 2019, No. 3 (63), pp. 40–43. (In Russ.)

17. Fadeeva A.N., Fadeev E.A., Shurhaeva K.D., Abrosimova T.N., Dostizheniya nauki i tekhniki APK, 2015, T. 29, No. 5, pp. 20–22. (In Russ.)

18. Bendina Ya.B., Agrarnaya Rossiya, 2019, No. 4, pp. 24–28. (In Russ.)

19. Vishnyakova M.A., Seferova I.V., Samsonova M.G., Sel'skohozyajstvennaya biologiya, 2017, T. 52, No. 5, pp. 905–916. (In Russ.)

20. Polushkin P.V., Zubkov V.V., Agrarnaya Rossiya, 2019, No. 6, pp. 3–7. (In Russ.)

21. Ochgbo A.E., Bello L.L., Vange T., Genotype by environment interaction of soybean (Glycine Max (L.) Merrill) for yield and yield components in the savanna, Journal of agriculture and veterinary science, 2016, Vol. 9, Issue 8, pp. 20–24.

22. Kashevarov N.I., Polyudina R.I., Potapov D.A., Dostizheniya nauki i tekhniki APK, 2020, Vol. 34, No. 8, pp. 28–32. (In Russ.)

23. Vydrin V.V., Fedoruk T.K., Sortovoe rajonirovanie sel'skohozyajstvennyh kul'tur i rezul'taty sortoispytaniya po Tyumenskoj oblasti za 2021 god (Varietal zoning of crops and results of variety testing in the Tyumen region for 2021), Tyumen': Tyumenskij izdatel'skij dom, 2021, 95 p.

24. Nettevich E.D., Doklady RASHN, 2001, No. 3, pp. 3–6. (In Russ.)

25. Rossielle A.A., Hamblin J., Theoretical aspects of selection for yield in stress and non-stress environments, Crop. Sci., 1981, No. 21 (6), pp. 943–946.

26. 26. Goncharenko A.A., Vestnik RASHN, 2005, No. 6, pp. 49–53. (In Russ.)

27. Dospekhov B.A., Metodika polevogo opyta (s osnovami statisticheskoj obrabotki rezul'tatov issledovanij) (Field experience methodology (with the basics of statistical processing of study results), Moscow: Al'yans, 2014, 351 p. (In Russ.)

28. Eberhart S.A., Russell W.A., Stability parameters for comparing varieties, Crop. Sci., 1966, No. 6 (1), pp. 36–40.

29. Hangil'din V.V., Nauch.-tekhn. byul. Vsesoyuz. selekcion.-genet. in-ta, 1986, No. 2, pp. 36–41. (In Russ.)

30. Kil'chevskij A.V., Hotylyova L.V., Ekologicheskaya selekciya rastenij (Ecological plant breeding), Minsk: Tekhnologiya, 1997, 372 p. (In Russ.)

31. Hangil'din V.V., Genetics of quantitative signs of agricultural plants, Moscow: Nauka, 1978, pp. 111-116. (In Russ.)

32. Hangil'din V.V., Shayahmetov I.F., Mordamshin A.G., Genetic analysis of quantitative characteristics of plants, Ufa: BF AN SSSR, 1979, pp. 5–39. (In Russ.)

33. Rekashus E.S., Dostizheniya nauki i tekhniki APK, 2022, Vol. 36, No. 4, pp. 52–60. (In Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Sapega V.A., Tursumbekova G.Sh. Comparative assessment of yield and adaptive potential of pea and soybean varieties in the conditions of the northern forest￾steppe zone of Northern Trans-Urals. Bulletin of NSAU (Novosibirsk State Agrarian University). 2023;(3):101-110. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31677/2072-6724-2023-68-3-101-110

Views: 190


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2072-6724 (Print)