The reaction of soybean and pea crops in the Priobye region to a humic antistress agent to herbicides in the foreststeppe of Western Siberia
https://doi.org/10.31677/2072-6724-2022-65-4-40-49
Abstract
In the article, the authors presented those enticing actual herbicidal treatments (the active ingredient is cloquintocet-mexyl, fenoxaprop-P-ethyl), spring-summer and summer droughts, are stress factors for the development of early-ripening soybean varieties and zoned pea varieties in the forest-steppe of the Priobye region. They limit the realization of the biological yield potential of soybeans and reduce the coarseness of pea grains and their total protein. Use with the herbicide of humic preparation from leonardite Cytogumat at a rate of 0.4 l/ha relieves physiological stress on soybean plants, providing a rapid increase in biomass and grain yield of 4.2-5.5 c/ ha, or 19%. Furthermore, the humic product in a single year can increase the duration of soybean vegetation by 3-4 days and the height of lower bean attachment by 24%. The authors analyze the stress resistance to the anti-cereal herbicide of 5 varieties of peas. They also found that the varieties Altaysky Usatiy and Novosibirets mediumresistant, Yamal, and Astronaut are sensitive to the herbicide. The application of Cytogumat in susceptible varieties increased green mass by 30.1% and 24.0%, grain yield by 10.5-12.0%, weight of 1000 grains by 7.1-7.4%, and total protein. In moderately resistant varieties, the reaction to Cytogumat was less pronounced and was accompanied by an increase in yield by 8–10%, grain size by 5–5.4%, and protein content by 1.9%. The Yamalsky pea variety in the Ob River region proved to be tolerant to stress, and it is inexpedient to use Cytogumat on it.
About the Authors
T. V. GavriletsRussian Federation
Ph.D. in Biological Sciences, Associate Professor,
Novosibirsk
L. N. Korobova
Russian Federation
Doctor of Biological Sciences, Professor,
Novosibirsk
Iu. V. Chudinova
Russian Federation
Doctor of Biological Sciences, Professor
L. P. Galeeva
Russian Federation
Doctor of Agricultural Sciences, Associate Professor,
Novosibirsk
References
1. Omel’yanyuk L.V., Asanov A.M., Karmazina A.Yu., Vestnik OmGAU, 2019, No. 2 (34), pp. 56– 65. (In Russ.)
2. Labyncev A.V., Grin’ko A.V., Goryachev V.P., Izvestiya OGAU, 2013, No. 5 (43), pp. 67–70. (In Russ.)
3. Eliseeva N.S., Bankrutenko A.V., Vestnik NGAU, 2015, No. 2 (35), pp. 32–38. (In Russ.)
4. Lysenko N.N., Prudnikova E.G., Matvejchuk P.N., Vestnik agrarnoj nauki, 2018, No. 5 (74), pp. 10–18. (In Russ.)
5. Vlasenko N.G., Sadohina T.P., Malyuga A.A., Kulagin O.V., Ivanov E.A., Himicheskie sredstva zashchity rastenij i ih primenenie na polyah Sibiri (Chemical means of plant protection and their application in the fields of Siberia), Novosibirsk, 2007, 107 p.
6. Gavrilec T.V., Korobova L.N., Nauchnoe i innovacionnoe obespechenie APK Sibiri (Scientific and innovative support of the agro-industrial complex of Siberia), Proceedings of the Conference Title, Barnaul, 2008, pp. 23–26. (In Russ.)
7. Korobova L.N., Shindelov A.V., Vestnik NGAU, 2012, No. 2–3, pp. 12–16. (In Russ.)
8. Korobova L.N., Holdobina T.V., Innovacii i prodovol’stvennaya bezopasnost’, 2018, No. 1 (19), pp. 97–104. (In Russ.)
9. Korobov V.A., Korobova L.N., Zashchita i karantin rastenij, 2009, No. 5, pp. 29. (In Russ.)
10. Holdobina T.V., Innovacii i prodovol’stvennaya bezopasnost’, 2014, No. 2 (4), 2014, pp. 39–46. (In Russ.)
11. Zahid H.S., Hafiz M.R., Tasneem A., Hameed A., Bahget T.H., Humic Substances: Determining Potential Molecular Regulatory Processes in Plants, Frontiers in Plant Science, 2018, 10.3389/fpls.2018.00263, 9.
12. Malyuga A.A., Enina N.N., Burmistrova T.I., Primenenie torfoguminovyh preparatov i mineral’nyh udobrenij pri vozdelyvanii kartofelya (The use of peat-humic preparations and mineral fertilizers in the cultivation of potatoes), Novosibirsk, 2009, 22 p.
13. Holdobina T.V, Petrov A.F., Teoriya i praktika sovremennoj agrarnoj nauki (Theory and practice of modern agricultural science), Proceedings of the Conference Title, 2019, pp. 115–118. (In Russ.)
14. Asanov A.M., Omel’yanyuk L.V., Yusova O.A. [i dr.], Dostizheniya nauki i tekhniki APK, 2020, T. 34, No. 10, pp. 50–55. (In Russ.)
15. Belyshkina M.E., Vestnik Ul’yanovskoj GSHA, 2018, No. 4 (44), pp. 77–84. (In Russ.)
16. Egli D.B., Soybean reproductive sink size and short-term reductions in photosynthesis during flowering and pod set, Crop Sci, 2010, Vol. 50, pp. 1971–1977.
17. Rozhanskaya O.A. Polyudina R.I., Sibirskij vestnik sel’skohozyajstvennoj nauki, 2012, No. 4 (227), pp. 69–76. (In Russ.)
18. Sozonova A.N., Ivanenko A.S., Vestnik gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta Severnogo Zaural’ya, 2017, No. 2 (37), pp. 90–94. (In Russ.)
19. Shakirzyanova M.S., Dostizheniya nauki i tekhniki APK,2016, T. 30, No. 12, pp. 28–30. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Gavrilets T.V., Korobova L.N., Chudinova I.V., Galeeva L.P. The reaction of soybean and pea crops in the Priobye region to a humic antistress agent to herbicides in the foreststeppe of Western Siberia. Bulletin of NSAU (Novosibirsk State Agrarian University). 2022;(4):40-49. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31677/2072-6724-2022-65-4-40-49