Effects of biological preparations on the predatory mite Phytoseiulus
https://doi.org/10.31677/2072-6724-2021-61-4-27-35
Abstract
The common spider mite Tetranychus urticae Koch is a dangerous pest. This pest occurs more frequently on cucumber crops than other pests and damages more than 200 other plant species, including aubergine, pepper, tomato, lemon, chrysanthemum, rose and carnation. The specific conditions of the protected environment allow greater use of biological agents for pest control. The modern concept of natural plant protection involves a combination of several birth control agents used to suppress pest populations. In this study, the authors studied the effect of biological preparations on the survival of the predatory mite Phytoseiulus persimilis Athias-Henriot (Acari: Phytoseiidae) under laboratory conditions. A laboratory evaluation was made of the effect of the biological preparations Bitoxybacillin, 1% and Fytoverm, 0.2%. These preparations significantly reduce acariphage numbers when released immediately after treatment. The predatory mite showed higher sensitivity in the variant with Fitoverm, 0.2%. Acariphage numbers decreased, but not significantly when plants were treated with Biovert (1%) and the fungus strain Metarhizium robertsii. Thus, plant treatment and acariphage release should be carefully regulated when phytoseiulus is released because of the adverse effects of bio preparations. The results confirm the potential use of biological practices combined with the predatory mite Phytoseiulus persimilis against the common spider mite Tetranychus urticae.
About the Authors
A. A. Zenkova
Novosibirsk State Agrarian University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
PhD in Agricultural Sciences,
Novosibirsk
D. Yu. Gavrilova
Novosibirsk State Agrarian University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Postgraduate student,
Novosibirsk
R. R. Kolokolov
Novosibirsk State Agrarian University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Postgraduate student,
Novosibirsk
References
1. Andreeva I.V., Tomilova O.G., Shternshis M.V., Pautinny`j kleshh. Biologiya i mery` bor`by` (Spider mite. Biology and control measures), Novosibirsk, 2000, 12 p.
2. Kovalenkov V.G., Tyurina N.M., Biologicheskaya zashhita rastenij – osnova stabilizacii agroe`kosistem (Biological plant protection - the basis for stabilizing agroecosystems), Proceedings of the Conference Title, Krasnodar, 2016, pp. 73–79. (In Russ)
3. Ramasubramanian T., Ramaraju K., Regupathy A., Acaricide resistance in Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae) – global scenario, J. Entomol., 2005, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 33–39.
4. Shternshis M.V., Shpatova T.V., Kuzneczova A.I., Tomilova O.G., Andreeva I.V., Agroximiya, 2006, No. 3, pp. 72–77. (In Russ)
5. Wei-Bing Shi, Ming-Guang Feng, Effect of fungal infection on reproductive potential and survival time of Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae), Exp Appl Acarol., 2009, No. 48, pp. 229–237.
6. Yagmur Oyku Dogan, Selcuk Hazir, Ayhan Yildiza, Tariq M.Butt, Ibrahim Cakmak, Evaluation of entomopathogenic fungi for the control of Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae) and the effect of Metarhizium brunneum on the predatory mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae), Biological Control, 2017, Vol. 111, pp. 6–12.
7. Shternshis M.V., Andreeva I.V., Tomilova O.G., Biologicheskaya zashhita rastenij (Biological plant protection), Sankt-Peterburg: Izd-vo Lan`, 2017, 332 p.
8. Mitina G.V., Pervushin A.L., Choglokova A.A., Biologicheskaya zashhita rastenij: uspexi, problemy`, perspektivy`(Biological plant protection: successes, problems, prospects), Proceedings of the Conference Title; Informacionny`j byulleten` VPRS MOBB, Sankt-Peterburg, 2017, No. 52, pp. 207–211. (In Russ)
9. Axatov A.K., Izhevskij S.S., Zashhita teplichny`x i oranzherejny`x rastenij ot vreditelej (morfologiya, obraz zhizni, vredonosnost`, bor`ba) (Protection of greenhouse and greenhouse plants from pests (morphology, lifestyle, harmfulness, control)), Moscow: Tovarishhestvo nauchny`x izdanij KMK, 2004, 307 p.
10. Numa Vergel S.J., Bustos R.A., Rodriguez C.D., Cantor R.F., Laboratory and greenhouse evaluation of the entomopathogenic fungi and garlic–pepper extract on the predatory mites, Phytoseiulus persimilis and Neoseiulus californicus and their effect on the spider mite Tetranychus urticae, Biol Control, 2011, No. 57, pp. 143–149.
11. Weinan Sun, Xuenong Xu, Ruixia Men, Zhongren Lei, Effects of Beauveria bassiana on predation and behavior of the predatory mite Phytoseiulus persimilis, Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, 2018. – P. 51–56.
12. Suxoruchenko G.I., Kozlova E.G., Ivanova G.P., Fitosanitarnaya optimizaciya agroe`kosistem (Phytosanitary optimization of agroecosystems), Materialy` tret`ego vserossijskogo s``ezda po zashhite rastenij, Sankt-Peterburg, 2013, T. II, pp. 103–107. (In Russ)
13. Shapiro I.D., Vilkova N.A., Novozhilov K.V., Voronin K.E., Shapiro V.A., Voprosy` e`kologicheskoj fiziologii nasekomy`x i problemy` zashhity` rastenij, Leningrad, 1979, pp. 5–17. (In Russ)
14. Zenkova A.A., Andreeva I.V., Zashhita i karantin rastenij, 2018, No. 11, pp. 12–14. (In Russ)
15. Zenkova A.A. Sovershenstvovanie biotekhnologii hishchnogo kleshcha Phytoseiulus persimilis Ath.-H. – akarifaga pautinnogo kleshcha (Improving the biotechnology of the predatory mite Phytoseiulus persimilis Ath.-H. - spider mite acariphage), candidate΄s thesis, Novosibirsk, 2020, 138 p.
Review
For citations:
Zenkova A.A., Gavrilova D.Yu., Kolokolov R.R. Effects of biological preparations on the predatory mite Phytoseiulus. Bulletin of NSAU (Novosibirsk State Agrarian University). 2021;(4):27-35. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31677/2072-6724-2021-61-4-27-35
Views:
319
Email this article 
