Ensuring cleanliness and health of flax crops when treated with new pesticides
https://doi.org/10.31677/2072-6724-2021-59-2-43-52
Abstract
Plant protection measures in flax cultivation should provide sufficiently clean from weeds, healthy sowings, forming the crop of necessary quality level, corresponding to economic and ecological criteria of modern agrotechnologies. The work aims to find promising herbicidal and protectivestimulating agents for providing cleanness from weeds and the health of flax crops when treating them with new pesticides, contributing to increasing the yield and quality of flax products. According to the classical methodology of scientific agronomy, the main experiments were carried out in the fields of FSBSI Federal Scientific Centre for Bast Crop, Flax Research Institute in the Tver region. As a result of experiments in 2018-2020, the herbicide Shanti and its mixture with Shanstrel 300 showed relatively high biological efficacy in protecting flax against dicotyledonous weeds. Furthermore, the addition of graminicides Haloshans or Cletoshans, growth regulator Artafit or fungicide Zimoshans to anti-wort herbicides did not reduce the effectiveness of the drug mixtures on dicotyledonous weeds and eliminated cereal weeds in crops. Additionally, Artafit and Zimoshans effectively protected flax from pasmo and other diseases, naturally increasing the yield of flax products. Its maximum values in the experiment were obtained in the variant of Artafit application together with herbicides. The use of Artafit had a positive effect on the quality of flax straw, increased it by 1-2 grades (from 2.00 to 2.50).
About the Authors
N. A. Kudryavtsev
Federal Research Centre for Bast Crops
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Doctor of Agricultural Sciences, Chief Scientific Officer
Torzhok
L. A. Zaitseva
Federal Research Centre for Bast Crops
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
PhD in Agricultural Sciences, Leading Researcher
Torzhok
Z. K. Kurbanova
Federal Research Centre for Bast Crops
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Postgraduate Student
Torzhok
References
1. Sibina S.A., Ekonomika Sibiri, 2020, No. 22, pp. 1–2. (In Russ.)
2. Kudryavcev N.A., Zajceva L.A., Vladimirskij Zemledelec, 2018, No. 2 (84), pp. 32–37, DOI: 10.24411/2235-2584-2018-00017. (In Russ.)
3. Frost C., Control of wild out (Avena fatua) Biatas, The Farmers Village, 1973, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 102–104.
4. Gregory A., Memoranda on the Aborigens of Australis, Journals of Anthropological Institute of Britain and Ireland, 1986, Vol. XV, No. 3–4, pp. 130–131.
5. Stafecka I., Graude D., Stramkale S., Diseases deversity for flax genetic resourses in Latva,Journals of dovnicae, 2017, Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 57.
6. Guenzi W.D., McCalla T.M., Inhibition of germination and seedling development by crop residues, Soil Sci. Soc. Amer., Proc, 1962, Vol. 26, pp. 456–458.
7. Hanelt P., Hammer K., Variabilitats – Indicaces von Papaver rhoeas – Popylationen und ihre Bezihungen zum Enwichlungstand der Landwirtschaft, Biol. Lbl., 1980, Vol. 99, No. 3, рp. 325– 43.
8. Zlotnikov A.K., Podvarko A.T., Ryabchinskaya T.A., Kudryavtsev N.A. [i dr], Zemledelie, 2017, No. 4, pp. 37–42. (In Russ.)
9. Savoskina O.A., Chebanenko S.I., Kurbanova Z.K., Shitikova A.V., Kudryavtsev N.A., Optimization of the phytosanitary condition of agrocenoses in the nonchernozem zone of the Russian Federation, International Simposium «Eath sciences: history, contemporary issues and prospects». Publishing, 2020, pp. 012–055.
10. Kudryavcev N.A., Zajceva L.A., Kurbanova Z.K., Savos’kina O.A., Zashchita i karantin rastenij, 2020, No. 4, pp. 24–26. (In Russ.)
11. Sredstva zashchity rastenij (Plant protection products), Voronezh, 2017, 48 p.
12. Chekmarev P.A., Ponazhev V.P., Pavlova L.N., Rozhmina T.A., Sorokina O.YU., Kudryavcev N.A. i dr., Zonal’no-adaptivnye tekhnologii proizvodstva l’na-dolgunca (Zonal-adaptive technology of production of flax-dollar), Moskow: FGNU «Rosinformagrotekh», 2011, 186 p.
13. «DyuPon de Nemur». Harmoni, Reklamnyj prospect, 2010, pp. 1–4. (In Russ.)
14. Shapoval O.A., Mozharova I.P., Korshunov A.A., Zashchita i karantin rastenij, 2014, No. 6. pp.18. (In Russ.)
15. Metodicheskie ukazaniya po ispytaniyu fungicidov v sel’skom hozyajstve (Methodical instructions for testing fungicides in agriculture), Sankt-Peterburg: VIZR, 2009, pp. 159–173.
16. Golubev A.S., Makhankova T.A., Methodological recommendations for testing herbicides(Methodical recommendations for the test of herbicides), Sankt-Peterburg: VIZR, 2020, 80 p.
17. Metodicheskie ukazaniya po provedeniyu polevyh opytov so l’nom-dolguncom (Methodical guidelines for field experiments with flax dollars), Torzhok: VNIIL, 1978, 72 p.
18. Kiryushin B.D., Metodika nauchnoj agronomii (Technique of scientific agronomy), Moskow: MSKHA, 2004, CHast’ 1, 168 p.; Moskow: MSKHA. 2005, CHast’ 2, 200 p.
19. Paket programm analiza polevyh opytov LANDSHAFT (Package of field experimental analysis programs Landscape), Tver’, VNIIMZ, 1999, 25 p.
20. Kulaichev A.P., Paket programm dlya IBM PK «STADIA». Versiya 7.0 (Software package for IBM PK Stadia. Version 7.0), Svidetel’stvo gosregistracii: №0115–97.1.0 RUS.
Review
For citations:
Kudryavtsev N.A., Zaitseva L.A., Kurbanova Z.K. Ensuring cleanliness and health of flax crops when treated with new pesticides. Bulletin of NSAU (Novosibirsk State Agrarian University). 2021;(2):43-52. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31677/2072-6724-2021-59-2-43-52
Views:
378
Email this article 
