Qualitative assessment of souls in technogenic landscapes of Gorlovskiy anthracitous deposit
https://doi.org/10.31677/2072-6724-2018-48-3-53-61
Abstract
The paper highlights the results of Morphological studies of soils formed on the outer 30year dumps of overburden and host rocks of the Gorlovskiy deposit and leached chernozem soil. The authors found out that soil covering contains initial, organic accumulative and sod types of embryosimes. Comparative morphological characteristics of soils indicates differences between chernozems and technogenic landscape soils. The results show that soil formation increases concentration of pedogenic organic matter in the soils which is almost equal to that in the black soil. The paper represents qualitative assessment of the soils. The authors calculate the index of specific features which reveals significant differences in the contribution to total variation of different soil properties. The article shows that embryosimes formed on loose sediments are the most fertile. It is established that the level of quality value in rocky soils is determined by concentration of physical clay; in the soils formed on loose rocks it is explained by humus concentration.. The ecosystem is not in a meta-stable climax state; it is developing dynamically, being at the stage of forming sod embryosimes. Therefore, the soil and environmental condition of tailings is satisfactory, as the embryosimes have not been formed after 31 years later the initial phase of technogenesis started. Humus accumulating embryosimes are expected to be formed in the soil covering as well as dry steppe souls on technogenic eluvium and neogenic clays.
About the Authors
V. G. DvurechenskiyRussian Federation
Candidate of Biology
D. A. Sokolov
Russian Federation
Candidate of Biology.
Novosibirsk
V. P. Seredina
Russian Federation
Dr.of Biological Sc.
References
1. Okorokova T. L., Sokolov D. A. Pochva – resurs jekologicheskoj i prodovol’stvennoj bezopasnosti (Soil is a resource of ecological and food security), Proceeding of the III Youth Conference on soil science, September 26–30, 2016, Novosibirsk, 2016, pp. 300–308. (In Russ.)
2. Ugol’naja baza Rossii. Tom II. Ugol’nye bassejny i mestorozhdenija Zapadnoj Sibiri (Kuzneckij, Gorlovskij, Zapadno-Sibirskij bassejny; mestorozhdenija Altajskogo kraja i Respubliki Altaj) (Coal base of Russia. Volume II. Coal pools and deposits of Western Siberia (Kuznetsky, Gorlovsky, West Siberian basins, deposits of the Altai Territory and the Altai Republic), Moscow: Geoinformcentr, 2003, 604 p.
3. Gossen I. N., Kulizhskij S. P., Danilova E. B., Sokolov D. A. Vestnik NGAU, 2016, No. 2 (39), pp. 71–81. (In Russ.)
4. Trefilova O. V., Grodnickaja I. D., Efimov D. Ju. Pochvovedenie, 2014, No. 1, pp. 109– 119. (In Russ.)
5. Dvurechenskij V. G., Seredina V. P. Bezopasnost» zhiznedejatel’nosti, 2017, No. 12, pp. 47– 52. (In Russ.)
6. Zinovik K. V., Dvurechenskij V. G., Seredina V. P. Pochva – resurs jekologicheskoj i prodovol’stvennoj bezopasnosti. (Soil is a resource of ecological and food security), Proceeding of the III Youth Conference on soil science, September 26–30, 2016, Novosibirsk, 2016, pp. 225–230. (In Russ.)
7. Kurachev V. M., Androhanov V. A. Sibirskij jekologicheskij zhurnal, 2002, No. 3, pp. 255– 261. (In Russ.)
8. Shherbinin V. I. Principy bonitirovki pochv Zapadnoj Sibiri (Principles of boning of soils in Western Siberia), Novosibirsk: Nauka, Sib. otd-nie, 1985, 118 p.
9. Androhanov V. A., Kurachev V. M. Pochvenno-jekologicheskoe sostojanie tehnogennyh landshaftov: dinamika i ocenka (Soil-ecological state of technogenic landscapes: dynamics and evaluation), Novosibirsk: Izd-vo SO RAN, 2010, 224 p.
10. Agrohimicheskie metody issledovanija pochv (Agrochemical methods of soil investigation) Moscow, 1965, 436 p.
11. Vadjunina A. F. Korchagina Z. A. Metody issledovanija fizicheskih svojstv pochv i gruntov (Methods for studying the physical properties of soils and soils), Moscow: Vyssh. shk., 1973. 400 p.
12. Sokolov D. A., Androhanov V. A., Kulizhskij S. P., Gurkova E. A. Pochvovedenie, 2015, No. 1, pp. 106–117. (In Russ.)
13. Semina I. S., Belanov I. P., Shipilova A. M., Androhanov V. A. Prirodno-tehnogennye kompleksy Kuzbassa: svojstva i rezhimy funkcionirovanija (Natural and technogenic complexes of Kuzbass: properties and modes of functioning), Novosibirsk: Izd-vo SO RAN, 2013, 396 p.
14. Sokolov D. A., Kulizhskij S. P., Belanov I. P. Prirodno-tehnogennye kompleksy: sovremennoe sostojanie i perspektivy vosstanovlenija (Natural-technogenic complexes: the current state and prospects for recovery), Proceeding of the International Scientific Conference, 2016, pp. 229– 237. (In Russ.)
15. Liseckij F. N. Sibirskij jekologicheskij zhurnal, 2012, No. 6, pp. 819–829. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Dvurechenskiy V.G., Sokolov D.A., Seredina V.P. Qualitative assessment of souls in technogenic landscapes of Gorlovskiy anthracitous deposit. Bulletin of NSAU (Novosibirsk State Agrarian University). 2018;48(3):53-61. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31677/2072-6724-2018-48-3-53-61